1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
3 years ago
9

Equity has a _________ effect on citizenship behavior and a _______ effect on counterproductive behavior.

Social Studies
2 answers:
Natalija [7]3 years ago
6 0
Equity has a positive effect on citizenship behavior and a negative effect on counterproductive behavior.
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
5 0
Positive
Negative

Thanks
You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT a specialized federal court? U.S. Claims Court U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Tax Court U.S. Bankruptcy C
Serhud [2]

Answer:

U.S Supreme Court

Explanation:

The Supreme Court is the highest rank court in America. It was created under Article 3 of the United States Constitution, which also gives Congress authority to legislate setting up a system of lower courts. In the current system of the federal court, there are 107 of these lower courts in both district and trial levels.

5 0
3 years ago
Bella enjoys interacting and hanging out with her groupmates at work. They find her to be very warm and kind. Even so, most peop
Katen [24]

Answer:

The correct answer is that Bella  has an amazing personality and people really enojyed hangig out with her but her work ethic and attention to details does not make her the best coworkers.

Explanation:

Sometimes the people who we most like does not mean they are perfect and great in other aspects of their life, they may have a great personal life howver not a great professional one.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
18. Determined that no state can override the Constitution
baherus [9]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
describe historical, social, political, and economic processes producing diversity, equality, and structured inequalities in the
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

Rising inequality is one of our most pressing social concerns. And it is not simply that some are advantaged while others are not, but that structures of inequality are self-reinforcing and cumulative; they become durable. The societal arrangements that in the past have produced more equal economic outcomes and social opportunities – such as expanded mass education, access to social citizenship and its benefits, and wealth redistribution – have often been attenuated and supplanted by processes that are instead inequality-inducing. This issue of Dædalus draws on a wide range of expertise to better understand and examine how economic conditions are linked, across time and levels of analysis, to other social, psychological, political, and cultural processes that can either counteract or reinforce durable inequalities.  

Inequality Generation & Persistence as Multidimensional Processes: An Interdisciplinary Agenda  

The Rise of Opportunity Markets: How Did It Happen & What Can We Do?  

We describe the rise of “opportunity markets” that allow well-off parents to buy opportunity for their children. Although parents cannot directly buy a middle-class outcome for their children, they can buy opportunity indirectly through advantaged access to the schools, neighborhoods, and information that create merit and raise the probability of a middle-class outcome. The rise of opportunity markets happened so gradually that the country has seemingly forgotten that opportunity was not always sold on the market. If the United States were to recommit to equalizing opportunities, this could be pursued by dismantling opportunity markets, by providing low-income parents with the means to participate in them, or by allocating educational opportunities via separate competitions among parents of similar means. The latter approach, which we focus upon here, would not require mobilizing support for a massive re-distributive project.  

The Difficulties of Combating Inequality in Time  

Scholars have argued that disadvantaged groups face an impossible choice in their efforts to win policies capable of diminishing inequality: whether to emphasize their sameness to or difference from the advantaged group. We analyze three cases from the 1980s and 1990s in which reformers sought to avoid that dilemma and assert groups’ sameness and difference in novel ways: in U.S. policy on biomedical research, in the European Union’s initiatives on gender equality, and in Canadian law on Indigenous rights. In each case, however, the reforms adopted ultimately reproduced the sameness/difference dilemma rather than transcended it.  

Political Inequality, “Real” Public Preferences, Historical Comparisons & Axes of Disadvantage  

The essays in this issue of Dædalus raise fascinating and urgent questions about inequality, time, and interdisciplinary research. They lead me to ask further questions about the public’s commitment to reducing inequality, the importance of political power in explaining and reducing social and economic inequities, and the possible incommensurability of activists’ and policy-makers’ vantage points or job descriptions.  

New Angles on Inequality  

The trenchant essays in this volume pose two critical questions with respect to inequality: First, what explains the eruption of nationalist, xenophobic, and far-right politics and the ability of extremists to gain a toehold in the political arena that is greater than at any time since World War II? Second, how did the social distance between the haves and have-not harden into geographic separation that makes it increasingly difficult for those attempting to secure jobs, housing, and mobility-ensuring schools to break through? The answers are insightful and unsettling, particularly when the conversation turns to an action agenda. Every move in the direction of alternatives is fraught because the histories that brought each group of victims to occupy their uncomfortable niche in the stratification order excludes some who should be included or ignores a difference that matters in favor of principles of equal treatment.  

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Would violation of this law be criminal or civil ? <br> Please don't answer if you're unsure!
Arada [10]
Hate Crimes are usually Civil because it's the intention to hurt someone due to a certain factor and everyone has certain rights and when they are violated the charges would be civil
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the enviorment shape ancient egyptian culture
    11·1 answer
  • Religious reasons and political reasons why the people moved west
    8·1 answer
  • Like the government, the American judiciary is divided into _____ and _____ systems.
    8·1 answer
  • Who where the first to capture slaves?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the tree L'of power in the 1500s?
    7·1 answer
  • A seller entered into a written contract to sell a tract of land to a buyer. The buyer was to pay $1,500 per month for five year
    5·2 answers
  • Select the FALSE statement from below: A. Asking for participant feedback may cause a session to end on a negative note. Therefo
    14·1 answer
  • 2. When making a U-turn at an intersection, you should begin the maneuver __________ .
    13·1 answer
  • What countries were involved in the Afghanistan war?
    6·2 answers
  • What does an Indo-Australian PLATE MODEL mook like?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!