“We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have
reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.” Which best describes the colonists’ view of their relationship with the British government?
<span>When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which implement them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that, they are endowed by their creator with certain unAlienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, government are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principals and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mandmknd are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. </span>
He basically explained it as the rich being given everything first, then whatever’s left is for the middle class leaving the poor with little to nothing. It is basically favoring the wealthy first and leaving the needs of those less fortunate to live off charity, he says this as “taking care of the strong and hope that economic ambition and charity will do the rest.”
Thinking about Newton's third law we could say that if I'm standing on the sidewalk the Earth is pulling you down with a gravitational force of 500 N (your force in kg), you are also pulling the Earth up with a force gravitational 500 N. And is or in relation to the car, this also goes forward driven by its engine. The plane, on the other hand, has the ability to only go forward and not down. Due to the power of its engines and its aerodynamics.
