Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer:
2, -5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
See Explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Solving (a):
First, we categorize each data (to get their frequencies):
PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI ---> Frequency: 9
S S S S S S S S---> Frequency: 8
V V V V V V V V V V V V V ---> Frequency: 13
PO PO PO---> Frequency: 3
B ---> Frequency: 1
C C ---> Frequency: 2
Total = 36.
The frequency table is as follows:

Solving (b): The relative frequency and percentage.
Relative frequency is calculated by dividing each frequency by the total frequency.
So, we have:





The percentage is calculated by multiplying the frequency by 100%.
So, we have:






Solving (c): Percentage that mentioned vegetables and fruits, poultry, or cheese?.
This is calculated as:



(d) See attachment for bar graph
I think it’s A I don’t know tbh