According to the Equal Pay Act, the situation presented is an example of wage discrimination based on gender.
The Equal Pay Act is a United States labor law passed in 1963. This law was created to abolish the gender pay gap.
According to this law, employers (public and private) are prohibited from paying differentiated salaries based on sex in jobs that require equal skills, effort and responsibilities, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
Based on the Equal Pay law, the situation of two employees of different sex who perform a job as HR Analyst - classification and compensation and receive different salary if it is discriminatory due to:
- Are employees of the same employer
- They perform the same tasks with the same skill, effort, and responsibility requirements.
- They are in similar or equal working conditions.
According to the foregoing, it can be inferred that it is a differential treatment based on discrimination based on sex.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/2396617
To learn how people are searching online, a keyword analysis would be most relevant.
Answer:
It often proves difficult to actually realize the change that you have come up with. Especially when it comes to cultural or behavioral change. We want to show that change is not so much something that you have to get others to join. You have to make your change part of it
Answer:
Total weekly pay of August = = $ 1468.75
Explanation:
Annual salary = $30,000
Monthly Salary = $ 30,000/12= $ 2500
Salary for 40 hours * ( 4 weeks) = 160 hours = $ 2500
Salary for 1 hour= $ 2500/160= $ 15.625= $ 15.63
He worked additional 4 hours so pay for four hours is = 4 * 15.63= $ 62.5
But as he is a non exempt employee he is entitled to get 1.5 times higher than normal pay for over time so
he will be paid $ 62.5 * 1.5= $ 93.75 for over time
Commission on Sales = 3 % of $25,000
= $ 750
Weekly pay= $ 2500/4= $ 625
Total weekly pay of August = Weekly pay + Commission + Overtime
= $ 625 + $ 750 + $ 93.75
= $ 1468.75
Answer:
Explanation: Both the marginal cost curve and the average variable cost curve are U-shaped. For many firms, this is true because their production exhibits increasing returns at low levels of output and decreasing returns at high levels of output. At the minimum of average cost, the marginal cost curve intersects the average cost curve. This is because when marginal cost is above average cost, average cost is decreasing and when marginal cost is below average cost, average cost is decreasing.
