Answer:
D. 2.97
Explanation:
The net operating asset turnover ratio is used to measure the efficiency of operating assets and to determine how well these assets are used to generate sales. The assets that are tested here are operating assets that are those assets which are required to run the day-to-day operations of the business. For instance, Property, plant, and equipment, inventory, and cash etc. Investments and unutilized assets do not fall under this category.
Here are are required to calculate the net operating asset turnover ratio, which is calculated as follows:
Net operating asset turnover = Net sales / Net operating assets
⇒ Net operating asset turnover for 2016 = 117,351 m / 39,502 m = 2.97.
It means that for each dollar invested in the operating assets generates $2.97 of revenue.
There are usually more positive than negatives when it comes to moving manufacturing from the United States to China. It's cheaper to pay wages in China for the same type of work that someone in America would expect to be paid. Not only can you pay the workers less, you can then afford to expand and hire more people due to saving the money on American wages. Usually, you can also get products cheaper in China and cut down the cost of your product. However, with cheaper labor and materials comes cheaper quality and the quality dropping may hurt consumers willingness to buy.
Answer: C. high returns
Explanation: Risk-return tradeoff is an investing theory which indicates that as higher the risk, the greater the return reward. In order to determine an acceptable risk-return tradeoff, investors need to weigh several aspects, including total risk exposure, the ability to substitute missing capital, and more.
Answer:
Option c is correct
$245,680
Explanation:
The total manufacturing cost = $737,040.
Units produced = 22,200
Cost per unit before adjustment for absorbed overhead=
=$737,040./22,200 units
=$33.2 per unit
Cost of goods sold before adjustment for overheads
= (cost per unit × units sold)
= $33.2 × 7,400
= $245,680
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
