<span>Persuasive speakers should be concerned with what strengthens and weakens an argument. Earlier we discussed the process of building an argument with claims and evidence and how warrants are the underlying justifications that connect the two. We also discussed the importance of evaluating the strength of a warrant, because strong warrants are usually more persuasive. Knowing different types of reasoning can help you put claims and evidence together in persuasive ways and help you evaluate the quality of arguments that you encounter. Further, being able to identify common fallacies of reasoning can help you be a more critical consumer of persuasive messages.</span>
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj4tdW4uZTfAhVElFQKHTnuDxAQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fowl.purdue.edu%2Fowl%2Fresearch_and_citation%2Fapa_style%2Fapa_formatting_and_style_guide%2Fgeneral_format.html&psig=AOvVaw0j39A19ts0K5A2X4bgO-O-&ust=1544503333895766
Two types of argument would be a non-emergency argument meaning it does not really count, it will be over later. And the seccond argument would be a emergency argument meaning it would actually count towards something. The emergency argument is more important
