A) a global holy war to destroy any and all non- Muslim peoples
Jacob isn't one of the Great Partriarchs who had once built altars.
In the traumatic aftermath of World War One, many questioned whether man's civilization had revealed a dooming weakness, and if one of its greatest achievements—democracy—was only a fragile ideal. Did the war to make the world "safe for democracy" expose a world unfit for democracy? And what about America? For 130 years the republic had survived chronic growing pains and a murderous civil war, but was it, too, displaying signs of dissolution and rot? Voter apathy, corruption in city politics, the "tyranny of the fifty-one percent," the suppression of black voting in the South—American democracy seemed worn, cracked, and vulnerable.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
Proponents claimed the acts were designed to protect the United States from alien citizens of enemy powers and to stop seditious attacks from weakening the government
credit to: answers.yahoo.com
Britain<span> also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to </span>tax<span> the </span>colonies<span>. They decided to require several kinds of </span>taxes <span>from the </span>colonists<span> to help pay for the French and Indian War.</span>
