1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex17521 [72]
3 years ago
12

In the movie Groundhog Day, Bill Murray's character grows frustrated as he experiences the same day in his life over and over ag

ain. With each "passing" day, he is able to respond to people's actions more and more quickly because of
Social Studies
1 answer:
zubka84 [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Repetition Priming

Explanation:

In the movie Groundhog Day, Bill Murray's character grows frustrated as he experiences the same day in his life over and over again. With each "passing" day, he is able to respond to people's actions more and more quickly because of REPETITION PRIMING

You might be interested in
I need one big paragraph about why duty ethics is bad ?PLEASE
gladu [14]
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>

...it is hard to believe that it could ever 

8 0
3 years ago
At which of the following fossil sites did archaeologists find the earliest homo erects remain?
grin007 [14]
B. Lake turkana, Kenya.
6 0
3 years ago
Whose job was it to protect the King and his nobles?
andrey2020 [161]
Leased land aka fiefs or fiefdoms
4 0
3 years ago
Why were the plebeians unhappy with the roman society?
aniked [119]
The plebeians were unhappy with Roman society because the laws were only benefiting the patricians.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose the best answer. The War of 1812 resulted in the United States gaining _________.
Karolina [17]
Respect from other countries
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Does krakauer cite any evidence that suggests he "knows" his analysis is accurate?
    9·2 answers
  • Many people avoid conflict because they do not understand the difference between
    9·1 answer
  • The key event that marks the rite of passage into adulthood in the United States is
    15·1 answer
  • Niamh lived in New York City in 2001, so she remembers in detail what the city was like during the terrorist attacks on the Worl
    5·1 answer
  • During your internship with the medical examiner's office, you observe the ME attempt to identify an unknown individual based on
    11·1 answer
  • What is Developed Nations?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the delegates meet at the Constitutional Convention? a. To fix the Articles of Confederation b. To write a Constitution
    10·1 answer
  • Which organization issued the credo for communication ethics? a. national ethics association b. national communication associati
    13·1 answer
  • Schick reports information that suggests that many high school science teachers are:_____.
    7·1 answer
  • Which phase of helping relationships is the nurse exercising when collecting a clients medication information by interviewing th
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!