1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vitek1552 [10]
3 years ago
11

What Supreme Court Case established the principle of judicial review

History
1 answer:
worty [1.4K]3 years ago
3 0
On this day in 1803, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, decides the landmark case of William Marbury versus James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States and confirms the legal principle of judicial review–the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional–in the new nation. The court ruled that the new president, Thomas Jefferson, via his secretary of state, James Madison, was wrong to prevent William Marbury from taking office as justice of the peace for Washington County in the District of Columbia. However, it also ruled that the court had no jurisdiction in the case and could not force Jefferson and Madison to seat Marbury. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court jurisdiction, but the Marshall court ruled the Act of 1789 to be an unconstitutional extension of judiciary power into the realm of the executive. In writing the decision, John Marshall argued that acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution are not law and therefore are non-binding to the courts, and that the judiciary’s first responsibility is always to uphold the Constitution. If two laws conflict, Marshall wrote, the court bears responsibility for deciding which law applies in any given case. Thus, Marbury never received his job. Jefferson and Madison objected to Marbury’s appointment and those of all the so-called “midnight judges” appointed by the previous president, John Adams, after Jefferson was elected but mere hours before he took office. To further aggravate the new Democratic-Republican administration, many of these Federalist judges–although Marbury was not one of them–were taking the bench in new courts formed by the Judiciary Act, which the lame-duck Federalist Congress passed on February 13, 1801, less than a month before Jefferson’s inauguration on March 4. As part of the “Revolution of 1800,” President Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican followers launched a series of attacks against the Federalist-controlled courts. The new Democratic-Republican-controlled Congress easily eliminated most of the midnight judges by repealing the Judiciary Act in 1802. They impeached Supreme Court justice Samuel Chase, but acquitted him amidst inner-party squabbles. The Chase acquittal coupled with Marshall’s impeccably argued decision put an end to the Jeffersonian attack.
You might be interested in
What is a potential downside of globalization A. cheaper prices D. the loss of American jobs C. loss of excess loss of access to
VladimirAG [237]
American jobs would be lost because globalization encourages worldwide distribution of products, which also distributes jobs across the world. For example, Ford Motors almost built a factory in Mexico due to the encouragement by the US government to increase globalization as it would be cheaper.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
18. Legal drug abuse can't cause physical harm or dependence
In-s [12.5K]

Answer: False. True, True

3 0
3 years ago
What's your interpretation, consider these three arguments on the causes of WW2
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For what reasons could Thailand be described as a developing country in the 1970s? In what ways was it able to change?
Sonja [21]

Answer:

In the 1970s, Thailand had a very low GDP Per Capita. In 1970, Thailand's GDP Per Capita was only 192 dollars. For comparison, the U.S. GDP Per Capita in the same year was 5.247 dollars.

Besides, in the 1970s, Thailand was a monarchy where the king at the time: king Bhumibol Adulyadej, had effective powers over the people. Not all monarchies are developing countries, but monarchies and dictatorships tend to be poorer because of the lack of independent judiciary and enforcement of property rights which disincentivizes investment and economic growth.

3 0
3 years ago
The principle of federalism means that the
morpeh [17]

Answer:

false, the federal government should have most of the power, not all of it. The federal government should have more power than state governments.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which development most influenced the expansion of trade?
    15·2 answers
  • What is Thomas Paine speaking out against in his Common Sense
    6·1 answer
  • According to the treaty, would the Soviet Union have been allowed to join the European Union?​
    12·1 answer
  • Why is leonardo de vinci known as a renaissance man
    6·2 answers
  • Were critics of world war one anti american?
    8·1 answer
  • Responding to xenophobic concerns, congress passed an emergency law restricting immigration in 1921. Among other provisions, the
    10·1 answer
  • What primarily motivated the United States and the Soviet Union to provide
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the movement known as progressivism?
    14·1 answer
  • If you get to the ambitous level you dont have to watch ads
    6·1 answer
  • Which best completes the diagram?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!