Explanation:
The direct consequences of poverty are well-known — limited access to food, water, health care or education are a few examples. However, the consequences of poor living conditions on the community are seldom discussed; indeed, if members of a community suffer from poor living conditions, then the entire community suffers.
I believe the answer is: A just-noticeable difference
In painting, A just-noticeable difference refers to the amount of things that needed to be change for a difference to be noticeable.
The threshold usually depended on the type of audience that being aimed toward, (for common audience, the threshold of differences would be relatively higher compared to expert audience)<span />
Answer:
All of them. :)
Explanation:
Or, the household controls all factors of production, which are land, labor and capital. :)
The reanalysis of data that was originally gathered for other purposes or by other researchers is an example of secondary analysis.
Secondary analysis is the practice of the use of secondary information in studies. As a studies approach, it saves both money and time and avoids unnecessary duplication of research efforts. Secondary evaluation is usually contrasted with number one evaluation, that is the evaluation of primary information independently accrued by a researcher.
Secondary evaluation is a form of research that makes use of current records, or secondary information, amassed formerly to carry out a brand new observation. Researchers may use quantitative or qualitative facts some other research crew or business enterprise accrued or produced for specific motives and examine it in a brand new way.
The secondary analysis involves a researcher using the information that a person else has gathered for his or her own purposes. Researchers leverage secondary information analysis and try to answer a new study's query or to take a look at an alternative angle at the unique query of a previous observation.
Learn more about Secondary analysis here brainly.com/question/6032141
#SPJ4
Although children of authoritarian caregivers tend to be productive in school, they seem to have fewer social skills than other children. True
Explanation:
Although children of authoritarian caregivers tend to be productive in school because of the strict discipline they grow up in and the way the school rewards discipline and the willingness to study over other scholastic achievements specially in early curriculum.
More often than not students who are forced to study more tend to do better initially in studies but they have a severe lack in social skills compared to other children
