1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MAXImum [283]
4 years ago
11

A 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that

in offices where smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11.6 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was 7.3 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.9 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.7 ppm.
To test for whether or not the mean CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments, perform a t-test for unequal variance and report the p-value
Mathematics
1 answer:
kotegsom [21]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The null hypothesis is not rejected.

There is no enough evidence to support the claim that the CO level is lower  in non-smoking working areas compared to smoking work areas.

P-value = 0.07.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to perform a test on the difference of means.

The claim that we want to test is that CO is less present in no-smoking work areas.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a:\mu_1-\mu_2 > 0

being μ1: mean CO level in smoking work areas, and μ2: mean CO level in no-smoking work areas.

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

Smoking areas sample

Sample size n1=40.

Sample mean M1=11.6

Sample standard deviation s1=7.3

No-smoking areas sample

Sample size n2=40

Sample mean M2=6.9

Sample standard deviation s2=2.7

First, we calculate the difference between means:

M_d=M_1-M_2=11.6-7.3=4.3

Second, we calculate the standard error for the difference between means:

s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{7.3^2}{40}+\dfrac{2.7^2}{40}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{53.29+7.29}{40}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{60.58}{40}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{1.5145}=1.23

Now, we can calculate the t-statistic:

t=\dfrac{M_d-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_{M_d}}=\dfrac{4.3-0}{1.23}=3.5

The degrees of freedom are calculated with the Welch–Satterthwaite equation:

df=\dfrac{(\dfrac{s_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{s_2^2}{n_2})^2}{\dfrac{s_1^4}{n_1(n_1-1)}+\dfrac{s_2^4}{n_2(n_2-1)}} \\\\\\\\df=\dfrac{(\dfrac{7.3^2}{40}+\dfrac{2.7^2}{40})^2}{\dfrac{7.3^4}{40(39)}+\dfrac{2.7^4}{40(39)}} =\dfrac{(\dfrac{53.29}{40}+\dfrac{7.29}{40})^2}{\dfrac{2839.82}{1560}+\dfrac{53.14}{1560}} \\\\\\\\df=\dfrac{1.5145^2}{1.8545}=\dfrac{2.2937}{1.8545}=1.237

The P-value for this right tail test, with 1.237 degrees of freedom and t=3.5 is:

P-value=P(t>3.5)=0.07

The P-value is bigger than the significance level, so the effect is not significant. The null hypothesis is not rejected.

There is no enough evidence to support the claim that the CO level is lower  in non-smoking working areas compared to smoking work areas.

You might be interested in
Solve the equation and enter the value of x below.<br> x + 29 = 49<br> X =
andrew-mc [135]

Answer:

x = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 29 = 49

- 29       - 29

x=20

5 0
3 years ago
Please solve for w, p=21+2w
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

w = (p - 21)/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Rearrange the equation so that it is equal to w.

p = 21 + 2w

p - 21 = (21 + 2w) - 21

p - 21 = 2w

(p - 21)/2 = (2w)/2

(p - 21)/2 = w

w = (p - 21)/2

3 0
3 years ago
Prior Knowledge Questions (Do these BEFORE using the Gizmo.) Imagine you and your friends are making hot dogs. A complete hot do
slega [8]

Answer:

A. 8 complete hotdogs were made.

B. The wiener.

C. The bun.

Step-by-step explanation:

1 complete hotdog = 1 wiener + 1 bun

You have, 3*10 bun and 8 wiener

= 30 bun and 8 wiener

A. Since, we have 30 bun and 8 wiener and for 1 complete hotdog = 1 wiener + 1 bun

Therefore, 8 hotdogs = 8 wiener + 8 buns

= 8 complete hotdogs are made

B.

Since 8 complete hotdogs are made, 8 wiener and 8 buns are used.

Therefore, the limiting ingredient is the wiener because it is the smallest number of ingredient and none of it was left after making the 8 hotdogs.

C. Since 8 complete hotdogs are made, 8 buns were used

So, the leftover buns = (30 - 8) buns

= 22 buns

The buns is the leftover ingredient

3 0
4 years ago
I need help with this question
mariarad [96]

Answer:

133

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer is 133

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Using pemdas please
Bond [772]

 4^{3}+2(8)=80

Solution:

Given expression:

 4^{3}+2(8)

<u>Expansion of PEDMAS: </u>

Parenthesis, Exponents, Division, Multiplication, Addition, Subtraction.

To solve the given expression using pedmas rule.

First solve the expression with parenthesis.

 4^{3}+2(8)=4^{3}+16

Next do the exponents.

 4^{3}+2(8)=64+16

Finally do the addition.

 4^{3}+2(8)=80

Hence the answer is 80.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! CORRECT ANSWER ONLY PLEASE!!!
    15·1 answer
  • A jug of milk holds 4 quarts. How many liters of milk does the jug hold? Round your answer to the nearest hundredth of a liter.
    7·1 answer
  • Amelie says that every square is a regular quadrilateral. Do you think Amelie's generalization is true? Explain
    7·2 answers
  • Can someone help meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    9·2 answers
  • What property is this, 5x23x2
    14·1 answer
  • What is the missing value
    8·1 answer
  • Fred Myers bought a home with a 13% adjustable rate mortgage for 20 years. He paid $11.72 monthly per thousand on his original l
    6·2 answers
  • Write 5.712 × 10–^8 without exponents
    15·1 answer
  • What is the relation of vertically opposite angle​
    12·2 answers
  • A cube has a surface area of 54 square centimeters.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!