Answer:
The answer is 17
Hope this helps!
Mark me brainliest if I'm right :)
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
I reject it
Explanation:
The main purpose of Mercantilism is to maximize the exports of products made in one country while minimizing the imports at the same time. This is a very efficient method for a country to accumulate wealth.
But, this practice was what leading to the colonization period.
IN order to minimize import, European countries at that time attack and colonize smaller countries. They extract the resources from them and use it to sustain their own economy. Even though this made European countries gained wealth, it caused a massive economic destruction to the area they colonized.
<span>This is the definition of adaptation. From one's experiences and prior knowledge, you must use resources effectively to overcome a challenge. This, in turn, will provide you further knowledge about the situation that you can apply to other situations. By changing your actions based on what you already know and what you have is the definition of adaptation.</span>
i think it is c, the empire knew what it wanted essentially but they did not all have the same ideas on rueling so it didnt really work because theere were no set rules// guidelines
