1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler79 [48]
3 years ago
8

Psychologists who view the developmental process as a sequence of distinct stages generally believe that

Social Studies
2 answers:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: COGNITIVE PROCESS CAN NOT BE QUANTIFIED OF QUALIFIED.

Explanation: Mind is a constant whirlwind that has not an expiration date, it´s our body that perish and so the mind can´t survive without a vessel.

Our humanity (a concept that a few psychologist believe that it´s a combination between mind, soul and body) experiences a sequence of constant changes through the pass of time, a sequence that can slow down or accelerate, but never stops.

Aleksandr [31]3 years ago
3 0

ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ

<span>ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ</span>
You might be interested in
In the 1830s and 1840s, which idea would someone who believed strongly in the National Bank also be likely to support?
sesenic [268]
The answer is most likely A
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following choices would be an important reason why individuals are more likely to seek treatment if
xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are two ways that Americans can participate in their democracy.
natali 33 [55]
The answer is D all of these
3 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
What is development project​
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

Project development is the process and the facility of planning, organizing, coordinating, and controlling the resources to accomplish specific goals. The process takes a transportation improvement from concept through construction.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you repeatedly fail in your attempts to control your environment, you are likely to make no further attempts to escape or mak
    10·1 answer
  • This natural landmark can vary greatly in size as a result of flooding and evaporation. What is its correct name and location?
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you believe the poverty rate is so high in an oil-based economy like Saudi Arabia?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME I WILL MAKE YOU THE BRAINLEST ANSWER
    8·2 answers
  • The ashanti empire which african country was formely called gold coast
    10·1 answer
  • I need a summary about the articles of confederation please help me with this summary
    14·1 answer
  • "Constitution is the main law of the land". Justify​
    5·1 answer
  • Reasons why a good layout is necessary​
    14·1 answer
  • Who ever can tell me who said these quotes will get 20 points and will get to be The Brainliest
    8·2 answers
  • Popper considered Freud's psychoanalytic theories to be _______ because no matter what happened, the psychoanalyst could claim t
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!