Answer:
We should never have to sacrifice our personal freedom. I totally agree with all arguments on the NO side. It is violating the freedom of the citizens and is violating the rights of the Constitution. All pepole should be free, But not for our country's national securty. Why give up freedom?
Explanation:
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Well.... to start with the "Recession<span>" Tops The </span>Great Depression<span>. When the stock market crashed in October 1929, it was only the beginning of a long period of economic decline and uncertainty that would last more than a decade. ... In 2011 those few years often where described as the worst economic crisis since the </span>Great Depression. But how do the two differ in a quick answer.<span> The </span>difference<span> between the two is that the unemployment rate in "The Great R</span>ecession"<span> was less severe than in "The Great D</span><span>epression"</span>
3. I believe. I'm not sure 3 or 2
