The Ottoman empire split because of ww1
and the Russian empire
hope this helps
B, because the others have story elements that frequently appear in historical fiction. Not to mention how the only choice that used the word “historical” is B
1. Kennedy agreed to end the crises because they sent him a long rambling letter searching for a way out of the crises. The basic proposition was that if the U.S made a none invasion pledge then the soviets would remove their military presence in Cuba. From the U.S point of view, this was perfect.
2. Khrushchev agreed to end the crises because he wanted to avoid nuclear war and both sides acknowledged the risk, so both men agreed to end the crises to prevent war in any way possible.
3. On a scale i think both sides ended up winning because it could’ve ended up in a big devastating war between both sides of Kennedy would’ve refused the letter. Therefore i think both men won on protecting themselves from mass destruction on their land.
Answer:
•They used propaganda to control information
Explanation:
Dictatorships have freely employed mass media as mouthpieces for propaganda and indoctrination, or “brainwashing.” In Nazi Germany, the filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl boosted support for Hitler’s regime with visually impressive but thoroughly propagandistic movies like Triumph of the Will (1935). Stalinist Russia used mass media to churn out relentlessly optimistic artworks in the style of socialist realism, which featured heroic images of productive peasants, tireless factory workers, and stalwart soldiers and pilots, all toiling happily under Stalin’s leadership.
Answer: The Spanish had several goals when they established colonies in the Americas. One goal had to deal with economics. The Spanish was hoping to find resources, mainly gold and silver, that would be a boost to their treasury and to their economy.
Explanation:
