I believe the answer is A, but also C sounds familiar, I hope it is one of these! If not, I truly apologize.
Sarcasm - Apex :)
Sarcasm - the use of irony to mock someone and convey contempt.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer:
The correct answer is c.
Explanation:
Monopolies are considered negative in a free market economy because, through their economic dominance, they distort markets and stifle competition. In order to combat the rise of monopolies, the United States has a series of antitrust laws, which are meant to enhance competition and discourage and penalize monopolistic business practices.
The 1890 Sherman Act, the 1914 Clayton Act and the 1914 Federal Trade Commission Act represent the three main antitrust laws that regulate business practices for national and foreign enterprises that conduct trade in or with the United States. However, the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act regulates the international scope of these antitrust laws. Generally speaking, it states that they can't be enforced outside the US, unless the monopolistic practices affect exports from and imports into the US. According to this interpretation, <u>foreign companies that do business in the US can be subject to antitrust laws if their business practices are considered monopolistic under them</u>.
The false statement is The "Beltway mentality" is a desired goal of every presidential administration.
<h3>What is Beltway Mentality?</h3>
Beltway Mentality refers to the the American idiom which means to fulfill the needs and the desire of the specific group rather than considering the general population.
The complete question is attached below.
Thus the statement beltway mentality isn't the goal of the presidential administration. The president thinks about the population rather than the any corporate media or any other group. Thus the statement is false.
Learn more about presidential administration here:
brainly.com/question/2494251
#SPJ1
