1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denis-greek [22]
3 years ago
10

An employee has been told that he will be eligible for a large bonus if his current project is a success. He knows that the proj

ect will take a lot of work and effort, but believes he can reach success. He also could really use the bonus income. However, he is not highly motivated because he has some doubts about how fairly "success" will be measured by the corporate hierarchy, who have a reputation for finding loopholes to deny employee bonuses. This situation illustrates a situation with low _____.
Business
1 answer:
poizon [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

instrumentality

Explanation:

It is related to Vroom expectancy motivation theory, which assumes that behaviour result from conscious choices among alternatives, it purpose is to maximize pleasure and to minimize pain. Vroom used the variables Expectancy, Instrumentality and Valence in order to set his theory.

Expectancy: Related to the belief that increased effort  means that the performance also increase. For example: if you work harder then you have better results.

Instrumentality: Belief that if a person perform well then he or she would receive  a valued outcome. It sets the degree to which a first level outcome has to lead to a second level outcome. For example: If you do a good job, then it has something for you on it.

Valence: Represents the importance that the individual place has upon expected outcome. For it to be positive, the person should prefer attaining the outcome to not attaining it. For example: If what motivates you is money, then you are not going to value offers such as additional time off.

You might be interested in
Congratulations! Your portfolio returned 17.5​% last​ year, 2.2​% better than the market return of 15.3​%. Your portfolio had a
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

0.681 and better

Explanation:

The formula to compute the Sharpe measure is shown below:

Sharpe ratio = (Portfolio return − Risk-free rate) ÷ (Standard deviation of portfolio return )

= (17.5% - 3.2%) ÷ (21%)

= 0.681

Simply we deduct the risk free return from the portfolio return and divide it by the standard deviation of portfolio return

And the market Sharpe measure would be 0.31 and ours Sharpe measure would be 0.681 which reflect the better

8 0
3 years ago
Carrie recently received the Employee of the Year award at the call center where she works as a customer service representative.
Readme [11.4K]

Answer: C. Carrie felt the strain of having to constantly fake positive emotions towards her customers

Explanation: Burn outs describes conditions where an individual becomes tired due to overwork. Carrie feeling the strain of having to constantly fake positive emotions towards her customers (due to her highly courteous nature) turned in her resignation as this can be very draining and can be seen as overwork.

5 0
3 years ago
1. Discuss the consumer decision making process for a product such as canned/packaged tuna and the response hierarchy model this
steposvetlana [31]

Answer

Because of the shift away from media promoting, the dynamic interaction has changed incredibly. When media promoting was weighty with COSI and StarKist, customers had gotten used to seeing the advertisements and their separate symbols. Buyers were extremely faithful to a particular brand and the reliability outgrew the recognizable symbols "Charlie the Fish" and the mermaid for COSI. Since the center has moved to principally print advertisements, advancements coming up, and coupons, there is something else entirely to keep the customer dynamic cycle occupied. An item, for example, canned fish isn't a need, and in this way can without much of a stretch be supplanted by substitutes. There is more seriousness since a buyer could simply pick a brand since it is the least expensive at a specific store or in light of the fact that they discovered a coupon in a notice. Brand devotion is done being squeezed into shoppers' psyches through business spots with an agreeable mermaid. Presently, organizations are battling to offer more advancements or more limits to build deals, yet the outcome is that for certain buyers each excursion to the store could end with an alternate brand on fish being bought. Purchasers are presently being reached at home through paper advertisements, intelligent item sites, and different advancements. Clients might have settled on their choice before going on an outing to the store. Clients would have followed the Progressive system of Impacts Model before the promoting endeavors moved from media publicizing. Shoppers knew about the brands since they were faithful and fabricated inclinations after some time that prompted buying one brand over the other. Presently, the last buy isn't driven by dedication, however rather each buy has the customer taking a gander at a few components. The activities of retail deals, print advertisements, or different advancements influence their purchasing conduct.

8 0
3 years ago
Last year, you purchased a stock at a price of $78.00 a share. Over the course of the year, you received $2.70 per share in divi
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

5.65%

Explanation:

Last year a stock of $78.00 was bought

During the period of one year $2.70 was received in dividend and inflation averaged 3.2%

Today the shares was sold for $82.20

The first step is to calculate the nominal return

= ($82.20-$78.00+$2.70)/$78.00

= 6.9/78

= 0.0885×100

= 8.85%

Therefore, the approximate real rate can be calculated as follows

= 8.85%-3.2%

= 5.65%

Hence the approximate real rate of return on this investment is 5.65%

6 0
3 years ago
Should companies be allowed to force stores to obey minimum prices? Yes or no? Explain the reason why you chose yes or no?
Viktor [21]
Yes, stores should be forced to obey minimum prices for a good or a company that is selling a service should as well. They should have to obey by this so that price competition isn't ongoing in the market. Larger producers can often charge a smaller amount for a product because they are producing them in high qualities. By charging less it gives them a competitive advantage over their competition in means of price. Unless the item is on clearance because a company is discontinuing stock of that item, they should have a set minimum as they do a set maximum they are allowed to charge for that item. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • With respect to the alternative evaluation stage of the consumer decision-making process, how a golf cart handles, how the brake
    12·1 answer
  • Ucc article 2 applies to sales transactions between all buyers and sellers.
    9·1 answer
  • Question 2-4, please?
    9·1 answer
  • Robins typically lay four eggs. Four eggs allow the offspring to be well fed, whereas larger clutches may result in malnourished
    5·1 answer
  • If the nominal annual interest rate is 12% compounded quarterly, what is the effective annual interest rate?
    10·1 answer
  • An engineer has a fluctuating future budget for the maintenance of a particular machine. During each of the first 5 years, $10,0
    11·1 answer
  • An automatic stabilizer:________
    14·1 answer
  • Tobias has a brokerage account and buys on the margin, which resulted in an interest expense of $52,000 during the year. Income
    15·1 answer
  • *Improper Answers = BAN*
    6·1 answer
  • You need to decrease your spending to balance your budget. which budget category is simplest to target for spending cuts?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!