The equation is already is slope intercept form where you can easily point out the gradient, or the slope, and the y intercept.
y=mx+b where m is the gradient, and b is the y intercept.
Since there is no m, the gradient is 1.
The y intercept had x=0 and y=b
b in this case is 6
the y intercept= (0,6)
Answer: 31, 932.74
Step-by-step explanation:
The population of the small town = 39,668
Yearly rate of decline = 1.5%
Therefore, to calculate 1.5% of 39,668 = 1.5 x 39,668
------------------
100
= 595.02
So, the population is declining by 595.02 on yearly basis.
To ascertain what will the population would have declined to in the next 13 years,
We multiply , = 595.02 x 13
=7,735.26
Now population in 13 years = 39,668 - 7,735.26
= 31,932.74
1. Horizontal asymptotes: None
Vertical asymptote: x=-2
RD: 2
Domain: First picture
Range: first pic
2.HA: y=1
VA: x= -5 negative
RD: x= 5 no negative
Domain: second pic
Range second pic
3.HA: y=0
VA: x=-4,4
RD: none
D: 3rd pic
R: 3rd pic
4.HA: none
VA: x=3
RD: x=-2
D: 4th
R: 4th
I hope this helps!!!!!!!
Answer:
The photo is not clear post a clear photo then i will see that
The companies being considered are:
The company that is concerned with corded telephones
The company that is concerned with cellphones
Let x represent the number of years since 2002 and y represent the total number of accounts
From the information given,
Considering the first company,
Initial number of accounts = 946 x 10^6
The number of accounts fell by approximately 28 million per year. This means that in x years, the number of accounts that would have been lost is
28 x 10^6 * x
= - 28x x 10^6
It is negative because it is reducing
The slope intercept form of a linear equation is expressed as
y = mx + c
where
m = rate of change
c = y intercept of value of y when x = 0
By comparing with the given scenario,
