Answer:
One variable equation that is (4800/x) represents percentage of Emily's dinner fat intake compared to total daily allowance of x gram.
Step-by-step explanation:
lets assume the variable for total daily allowance
lets say total daily allowance of fat = x grams
Fat consumed at dinner = 48 grams
Fat consumed at dinner in percentage = (Fat consumed at dinner/total daily allowance of fat) × 100
= (48 grams/x grams)×100=(4800/x)%
so (4800/x)%
So one variable equation that is (4800/x) represents percentage of Emily's dinner fat intake compared to total daily allowance of x gram.
lets take one example
lets says total daily allowance of fat for Emily = 100gm
so from derived equation that is 4800/x , we can get required percentage by putting x = total daily allowance of fat = 100gm
=4800/100 = 48%.
you can change value of variable x according to total daily allowance and get the required dinner intake percentage by equation 4800/x.
When you've got a squares bracket, this simply becomes the bracket twice, therefore, (r+s)2 becomes (r+s)(r+s)
You've then go to use FOIL, and this gives you r^2+rs+sr+s^2, and this cannot be simplified any further.
Therefore, the product of this is r^2 + s^2 + rs + sr
Hope this is what you're looking for :)
Answer:
a) Null and alternative hypothesis:

b) A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would mean a conclusion that the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, when in fact it is not.
c) The consequences would be that they would be more optimistic than they should about the result of the investment, expecting a proportion of students that is bigger than the true population proportion.
d) A Type II error is made when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. This would mean that, although the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, there is no enough evidence and it is concluded erroneously that the proportion is not significantly bigger than 10%
e) The consequences would be that the investment may not be made, even when the results would have been more positive than expected from the conclusion of the hypothesis test.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The hypothesis should be carried to test if the proportion of students that would eat there at least once a week is significantly higher than 10%.
Then, the alternative or spectulative hypothesis will state this claim: that the population proportion is significantly bigger than 10%.
On the contrary, the null hypothesis will state that this proportion is not significantly higher than 10%.
This can be written as:

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>The roots are:</u>
- 3, 3, 2 - 3i, 2 + 3i (conjugate of 2 - 3i should be added) and the leading coefficient is - 5
<u>The polynomial is:</u>
- -5(x - 3)² (x - [2 - 3i]) (x - [2 + 3i]) =
- - 5(x² - 6x + 9) (x² - 4x + 13) =
- -5(x⁴ - 10x³ + 46x² - 114x + 117) =
- -5x⁴ + 50x³ - 230x² + 570x - 585