1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
5

4- Going over the ratification debate between Federalists and anti-Federalist explain 2 main areas of conflict between these two

groups. Then choose a federalist paper we have studied, bullet point 3 main arguments of the paper. After that conclude by at least 2 examples of current implications of the paper in our political system.
History
1 answer:
Volgvan3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Conflicts were regarding to the extraordinary power given to the president and the Senate which would have a tyrannical rule.

Conflict regarding the passage of the Bill of Rights.

Debates over ratification in the fall and winter of 1787 - 88.

Explanation:

According to the Philadelphia Convention - a new Constitution for United States provided for a strong government with an extraordinary amount of power given to the president and the senate. The Anti - Federalists charged that the new federal government resembled a monarchy in its concentration of power at the expense of liberty. The Federalists rejected the arguments of the Anti - Federalists by relocating it in the people. They on the other hand argued that since the constitution which represented the people had sought to instruct and control the institutions of government, thus all sovereignty rested with the people and that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights,

The Anti - Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Under the leadership of Madison, the first federal Congress attempted to fulfill this promise and proposed twelve amendments to the Constitution. In 1791, ten of them were ratified by the states, and these became the Bill of Rights.

Current implications:

In the United States,

1. There is a federal court system.

2. The lower house represented the people; it became the civic faith of the United States to which all Americans must unquestionably adhere. The emergence of this rambunctious middling democracy was the most significant consequence of the American Revolution.

You might be interested in
Louis was an absolute monarch, but he was loved by his people and brought prestige to France. Do these facts justify his power?
cupoosta [38]

When a country is governed by an absolute <u>monarch who has not been elected, such goverment violates the social contract principle</u> that states that the power of a country resides on its citizens who can grant it to political representatives elected through suffrage and would propose and implement policies on their behalf.

On the other hand, it is not guaranteed that a monarch that has not been elected, would govern taking into account the interests and needs of his citizens, as there is not any manner of withdrawing him from such power position.

7 0
3 years ago
In 3–5 sentences, evaluate the factors that shaped U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East during George H.W. Bush’s administrati
IceJOKER [234]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The factors that shaped U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East during George H.W. Bush’s administration were the result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. After the attacks, President Bush ordered the creation of the Homeland Security Department and the attack of Afghanistan to eliminate the terrorist cell led by Osama bin Laden. I do not agree with Bush’s approach because he later invaded Irak under the premise that Sadam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction but those weapons were never found in Irak.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Many Sumerians were skilled metalworkers because of the abundance of metal in Sumer.
allsm [11]

Answer:

it is false

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Texans declare independence from Mexico in 1836​
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

Slavery was against Mexican law, but Americans brought slaves to Texas. Many American settlers and Tejanos, or Mexicans who lived in Texas, wanted to break away from Mexico. They did not like laws made by Santa Anna, Mexico's president. ... After this, Texans declared independence and formed the Republic of Texas.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Background information: This is a journal entry from a soldier fighting on the western front.
Nimfa-mama [501]
He did not have time to be tired
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following correctly compares capitalism, socialism, and communism? Capitalism values society collectively, while so
    7·2 answers
  • Historians once used the term feudalism to refer to
    11·1 answer
  • Why was g baby shot "hardball"
    9·1 answer
  • To what west coast states did many of the nice and from the dust bowl move in hopes of finding a better life?
    10·1 answer
  • Why does the Central Intelligence Agency have more freedom of action than other federal agencies?
    12·1 answer
  • What was ironic about the election of Andrew Johnson?
    10·2 answers
  • Please help me solve this problem please
    11·1 answer
  • Someone help me out???
    6·2 answers
  • The first turning point of WWII in Europe was the Nazi invasion of...
    14·2 answers
  • Who praised for making the economy strong during the 80's
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!