Balanced forces will result in which of the following

Consider a plane composite wall that is composed of two materials of thermal conductivities kA = 0.1 W/m*K and kB = 0.04 W/m*K a

nadya68 [22]

Answer:

q=39.15 W/m²

Explanation:

We know that

Thermal resistance due to conductivity given as

R=L/KA

Thermal resistance due to heat transfer coefficient given as

R=1/hA

Total thermal resistance

$R_{th}=\dfrac{L_A}{AK_A}+\dfrac{L_B}{AK_B}+\dfrac{1}{Ah_1}+\dfrac{1}{Ah_2}+\dfrac{1}{Ah_3}$

Now by putting the values

$R_{th}=\dfrac{0.01}{0.1A}+\dfrac{0.02}{0.04A}+\dfrac{1}{10A}+\dfrac{1}{20A}+\dfrac{1}{0.3A}$

$R_{th}=4.083/A\ K/W$

We know that

Q=ΔT/R

$Q=\dfrac{\Delta T}{R_{th}}$

$Q=A\times \dfrac{200-40}{4.086}$

So heat transfer per unit volume is 39.15 W/m²

q=39.15 W/m²

4 0

2 years ago

X+3=2 x=?? No spamming

PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

x+3=2

x=2-3꧁

꧁꧁꧂꧂꧂꧂

x=-1

4 0

2 years ago

Answer ppeeeeeaaaalll

Bad White [126]

Answer:

what

Explanation:

is this an exam or an test or what is it

3 0

2 years ago

2.) A fluid moves in a steady manner between two sections in a flow

Talja [164]

Answer:

$250\ \text{lbm/min}$

$625\ \text{ft/min}$

Explanation:

$A_1$ = Area of section 1 = $10\ \text{ft}^2$

$V_1$ = Velocity of water at section 1 = 100 ft/min

$v_1$ = Specific volume at section 1 = $4\ \text{ft}^3/\text{lbm}$

$\rho$ = Density of fluid = $0.2\ \text{lb/ft}^3$

$A_2$ = Area of section 2 = $2\ \text{ft}^2$

Mass flow rate is given by

$m=\rho A_1V_1=\dfrac{A_1V_1}{v_1}\\\Rightarrow m=\dfrac{10\times 100}{4}\\\Rightarrow m=250\ \text{lbm/min}$

The mass flow rate through the pipe is $250\ \text{lbm/min}$

As the mass flowing through the pipe is conserved we know that the mass flow rate at section 2 will be the same as section 1

$m=\rho A_2V_2\\\Rightarrow V_2=\dfrac{m}{\rho A_2}\\\Rightarrow V_2=\dfrac{250}{0.2\times 2}\\\Rightarrow V_2=625\ \text{ft/min}$

The speed at section 2 is $625\ \text{ft/min}$ .

3 0

2 years ago

Consider a multiprocessor system and a multithreaded program written using the many-to-many threading model. Let the number of u

Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

At the point when the quantity of bit strings is not exactly the quantity of processors, at that point a portion of the processors would stay inert since the scheduler maps just part strings to processors and not client level strings to processors. At the point when the quantity of part strings is actually equivalent to the quantity of processors, at that point it is conceivable that the entirety of the processors may be used all the while. Be that as it may, when a part string obstructs inside the portion (because of a page flaw or while summoning framework calls), the comparing processor would stay inert. When there are more portion strings than processors, a blocked piece string could be swapped out for another bit string that is prepared to execute, in this way expanding the use of the multiprocessor system.When the quantity of part strings is not exactly the quantity of processors, at that point a portion of the processors would stay inert since the scheduler maps just bit strings to processors and not client level strings to processors. At the point when the quantity of bit strings is actually equivalent to the quantity of processors, at that point it is conceivable that the entirety of the processors may be used at the same time. Be that as it may, when a part string hinders inside the piece (because of a page flaw or while summoning framework calls), the relating processor would stay inert. When there are more portion strings than processors, a blocked piece string could be swapped out for another bit string that is prepared to execute, along these lines expanding the usage of the multiprocessor framework.

4 0

2 years ago