Balanced forces will result in which of the following

For the following conditions determine whether a CMFR or a PFR is more efficient in removing a reactive compound from the waste

andrew11 [14]

Answer:

The PFR is more efficient in the removal of the reactive compound as it has the higher conversion ratio.

Xₚբᵣ = 0.632

X꜀ₘբᵣ = 0.5

Xₚբᵣ > X꜀ₘբᵣ

Explanation:

From the reaction rate coefficient, it is evident the reaction is a first order reaction

Performance equation for a CMFR for a first order reaction is

kτ = (X)/(1 - X)

k = reaction rate constant = 0.05 /day

τ = Time constant or holding time = V/F₀

V = volume of reactor = 280 m³

F₀ = Flowrate into the reactor = 14 m³/day

X = conversion

k(V/F₀) = (X)/(1 - X)

0.05 × (280/14) = X/(1 - X)

1 = X/(1 - X)

X = 1 - X

2X = 1

X = 1/2 = 0.5

For the PFR

Performance equation for a first order reaction is given by

kτ = In [1/(1 - X)]

The parameters are the same as above,

0.05 × (280/14) = In (1/(1-X)

1 = In (1/(1-X))

e = 1/(1 - X)

2.718 = 1/(1 - X)

1 - X = 1/2.718

1 - X = 0.3679

X = 1 - 0.3679

X = 0.632

The PFR is evidently more efficient in the removal of the reactive compound as it has the higher conversion ratio.

3 0

3 years ago

For a steel alloy it has been determined that a carburizing heat treatment of 11.3 h duration will raise the carbon concentratio

diamong [38]

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

For a steel alloy it has been determined that a carburizing heat treatment of 11.3 h duration at Temperature T1 will raise the carbon concentration to 0.44 wt% at a point 1.8 mm from the surface. A separate experiment is performed at T2 that doubles the diffusion coefficient for carbon in steel.

Estimate the time necessary to achieve the same concentration at a 4.9 mm position for an identical steel and at the same carburizing temperature T2.

Answer:

the required time to achieve the same concentration at a 4.9 is 83.733 hrs

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

treatment time t₁ = 11.3 hours

Carbon concentration = 0.444 wt%

thickness at surface x₁ = 1.8 mm = 0.0018 m

thickness at identical steel x₂ = 4.9 mm = 0.0049 m

Now, Using Fick's second law inform of diffusion

$x^2$ / Dt = constant

where D is constant

then

$x^2$ / t = constant

$x^2_1$ / t₁ = $x^2_2$ / t₂

$x^2_1$ t₂ = t₁ $x^2_2$

t₂ = t₁ $x^2_2$ / $x^2_1$

t₂ = ( $x^2_2$ / $x^2_1$ )t₁

t₂ = $($ $x_2$ / $x_1$ $)^2$ × t₁

so we substitute

t₂ = $($ 0.0049 / 0.0018 $)^2$ × 11.3 hrs

t₂ = 7.41 × 11.3 hrs

t₂ = 83.733 hrs

Therefore, the required time to achieve the same concentration at a 4.9 is 83.733 hrs

8 0

3 years ago

A rectangular region ABCD is to be built inside a semicircle of radius 10 m with points A and B on the line for the diameter and

Talja [164]

Answer:A rectangular region ABCD is to be built inside a semicircle of radius 10 m with points A and B on the line for the diameter and points C and D on the semicircle with CD parallel to AB. The objective is to find the height h * that maximizes the area of ABCD.

Formulate the optimization problem.

Explanation:A rectangular region ABCD is to be built inside a semicircle of radius 10 m with points A and B on the line for the diameter and points C and D on the semicircle with CD parallel to AB. The objective is to find the height h * that maximizes the area of ABCD.

Formulate the optimization problem.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following ranges depicts the 2% tolerance range to the full 9 digits provided?

Lyrx [107]

Answer:

the only one that meets the requirements is option C .

Explanation:

The tolerance of a quantity is the maximum limit of variation allowed for that quantity.

To find it we must have the value of the magnitude, its closest value is the average value, this value can be given or if it is not known it is calculated with the formula

x_average = ∑ $x_{i}$ / n

The tolerance or error is the current value over the mean value per 100

Δx₁ = x₁ / x_average

tolerance = | 100 -Δx₁ 100 |

bars indicate absolute value

let's look for these values for each case

a)

x_average = (2.1700000+ 2.258571429) / 2

x_average = 2.2142857145

fluctuation for x₁

Δx₁ = 2.17000 / 2.2142857145

Tolerance = 100 - 97.999999991

Tolerance = 2.000000001%

fluctuation x₂

Δx₂ = 2.258571429 / 2.2142857145

Δx2 = 1.02

tolerance = 100 - 102.000000009

tolerance 2.000000001%

b)

x_average = (2.2 + 2.29) / 2

x_average = 2,245

fluctuation x₁

Δx₁ = 2.2 / 2.245

Δx₁ = 0.9799554

tolerance = 100 - 97,999

Tolerance = 2.00446%

fluctuation x₂

Δx₂ = 2.29 / 2.245

Δx₂ = 1.0200445

Tolerance = 2.00445%

c)

x_average = (2.211445 +2.3) / 2

x_average = 2.2557225

Δx₁ = 2.211445 / 2.2557225 = 0.9803710

tolerance = 100 - 98.0371

tolerance = 1.96%

Δx₂ = 2.3 / 2.2557225 = 1.024624

tolerance = 100 -101.962896

tolerance = 1.96%

d)

x_average = (2.20144927 + 2.29130435) / 2

x_average = 2.24637681

Δx₁ = 2.20144927 / 2.24637681 = 0.98000043

tolerance = 100 - 98.000043

tolerance = 2.000002%

Δx₂ = 2.29130435 / 2.24637681 = 1.0200000017

tolerance = 2.0000002%

e)

x_average = (2 +2,3) / 2

x_average = 2.15

Δx₁ = 2 / 2.15 = 0.93023

tolerance = 100 -93.023

tolerance = 6.98%

Δx₂ = 2.3 / 2.15 = 1.0698

tolerance = 6.97%

Let's analyze these results, the result E is clearly not in the requested tolerance range, the other values may be within the desired tolerance range depending on the required precision, for the high precision of this exercise the only one that meets the requirements is option C .

4 0

3 years ago

Write a Nios II assembly program that reads binary data from the Slider Switches, SW11-0, on the DE2-115 Simulator, and display

Citrus2011 [14]

Algorithm of the Nios II assembly program.

Attain data for simulation from the SW11-0, on the DE2-115 Simulator
The data will be read from the switches in loop.
The decimal output is displayed using the seven-segment displays and done using the loop.
The program is ended by the user operating the SW1 switch

and

The decimal equivalent on the seven-segment displays HEX3-0 is

DE2-115
DE2-115_SW11
DE2-115_HEX3
DE2-115_HEX4
DE2-115_HEX5
DE2-115_HEX6
DE2-115_HEX7

<h3>The Algorithm and decimal equivalent on the seven-segment displays HEX3-0</h3>

Generally, the program will be written using a cpulator simulator in order to attain best result.

We are to

Attain data for simulation from the SW11-0, on the DE2-115 Simulator
The data will be read from the switches in loop.
The decimal output is displayed using the seven-segment displays and done using the loop.
The program is ended by the user operating the SW1 switch

This will be the Algorithm of the Nios II assembly program .

Hence, the decimal equivalent on the seven-segment displays HEX3-0 is

DE2-115
DE2-115_SW11
DE2-115_HEX3
DE2-115_HEX4
DE2-115_HEX5
DE2-115_HEX6
DE2-115_HEX7

For more information on Algorithm

brainly.com/question/11623795

6 0

2 years ago