Answer:
ach status. Also, provide one example of role conflict that you have experienced and one example of role strain. Be sure you are clear on the meaning of each of these terms before beginning this assignment AND to double check that you identify them correctly in your response before clicking submit.
PART TWO: Consider the importance of status and role, and in several complete, well-developed sentences (Approximately 100-125 words), explain Some specific ways how/why statuses and roles are important for individuals AND for society as a whole.
Explanation:
Option A, I am not sure I agree. Countries that allow further globalization, have increased growth rates and usually can make use of higher foreign direct investment rates in order to increase economic growth
<u>Explanation:
</u>
International trade gives a nation greater access to the domestic market to non-existent goods and production-based technology.
Foreign investment raises a country's foreign exchange savings, thus increasing the balance of payment.
Research has found that a rise in FDI in financially advanced countries leads to higher growth rates relative to those in financially underdeveloped countries.
The economic development effect of FDI is driven by atmospheric conditions like financial industry development and the educational level in a country
.
D, all of the above. All of the things stated could help you when planning to get into college.
Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.