Answer:
A coordination problem
Explanation:
This can best be thought of as a coordination problem.
Democratic voters in this district likely would prefer either Democrat to win compared with the Republican.
However, voters may have different preferences for which Democrat they most prefer.
By having a primary election first, Democratic voters can coordinate on which candidate to vote for in the general election, thereby making sure that they at least will elect one of the Democrats.
Hope this helps. Answer is in photo below.
Answer: The desire satisfaction theory states that the level of individuals happiness has to do with the satisfaction of their desires.
Explanation:
The desire satisfaction theory states that individuals level of well-being is directly proportional to the total level of desires satisfied in their life. According to the theory, one's life goes well once the person achieves his or her desires. Something is good for a person only if it satisfies the person's desires.
A desire might become defective because it is pointless not because the desire was not satisfied. Sometimes we have irrational or ill informed desires. An example is an individual who desires to draw a tattoo on his body but later becomes disappointed after drawing the tattoo. According to desire satisfaction theorists, this can be as a result of information failure. Also, theorists say that an individual might be worse off satisfying some desires not as a result of lower satisfaction gotten from the fulfillment of the desire but because the satisfaction is bad in itself. Lastly, theorists say a person may be disappointed because the desire is pointless and hence lacks excellence e.g. hitting a football against the wall or counting blade grasses.
Answer: a. What motivates people.
Explanation:
According to the doctrine of Psychologism Egoism, people are always motivated to act following their own interests, meaning that all human motivation is egoistic. This theory, therefore, is about what motivates people´s actions. Is not about what is good and right, as the motivation is considered ultimately egoistic. The theory establishes no relation between motivations and religion, nor normative ethics, or specific rules as deontology would suggest.
