1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svet-max [94.6K]
2 years ago
13

Samuel de champlain established french settlements in california and the southwest.

History
2 answers:
Andreyy892 years ago
5 0

The answer is false.
natali 33 [55]2 years ago
5 0

The asnwer is False. Samuel de Champlain did not established french settlement in California nor in the Soutwest. Champlain was a French explorer.  He established the french settlement in Canada and found the City of Quebec.

You might be interested in
According to the passage, what are the goals of the program? Check all that apply.
Scilla [17]

Answer:

to attract parents in the summer and teachers in the fall

to work with other agencies to reach users and spread content

to post content when students and parents will be most likely to see it

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help!!! i attached a picture!!!!!!
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

Answer is france :)

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the legacy of wwi
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:The war destroyed four empires – the German, Russian, Austro-Hungarian, and Ottoman – and redrew the political map of the world. The new nations and borders created after the war sowed the seeds for new conflicts in the Baltics, the Balkans, Africa, and throughout the Middle East, many of which ravage the world today.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Were new states in the west equal to the original 13 states?
aleksandr82 [10.1K]
The answer to this question would be yes.
6 0
2 years ago
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were the efforts of Britain labor unions and social reformers in the 19th century similar
    10·1 answer
  • What negative consequences could result from companies generating more products than they can sell?
    15·1 answer
  • When the Boucicauts established the world’s first department store, they introduced many changes. Mark the statement if it accur
    6·1 answer
  • The first people to the new world came from where?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the area in between opposing trenches called during world war 1
    9·1 answer
  • What did the British find to export to India to pay for their tea?
    14·1 answer
  • The Jewish people who strove for a homeland were called
    11·1 answer
  • As president, William Howard Taft
    13·1 answer
  • How did an increase in food production lead to the development of craftspeople?
    15·1 answer
  • What's the population of all the African countries?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!