Answer:
total revenue = is 99300
Explanation:
given data
expects to sell in October = 3,000 units
expects sales to increase = 10%
Sales price stay constant = $10 per unit
solution
we get revenue hereby the sum of revenue of oct + nov + dec
revenue = price × quantity .........................1
total revenue = is 99300
Answer:
Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.
In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.
Explanation:
Answer:
reconciliate balance $ 22,388,675
Explanation:
bank statement: 18,835
deposits in transit 100,740
22,376,200
outstanding check
10189 (56,710)
10192 (15,365)
10193 (22,650)
10194 (12,375)
Adjusted balance: 22,388,675
checkbook balance: 22,385,105
interest earned 4,020
ATM card fees (450)
Adjusted balance: 22,388,675
Notes: For each statement we adjust for the unknown information.
The bank is unaware of the outstanding check and the deposit in transit. So we adjust for these concepts.
The company has no knowledge of the ffes and interest earned until receiving the bank statement so we must adjust for that amount.
Answer:
d. Mexico has nothing to gain from importing United States pork.
Explanation:
The principle of comparative advantage asserts that countries (in this case Mexico) are better off importing certain goods (in this case pork), given that the opportunity cost of importing such goods are less in comparison to the production costs of manufacturing them within the country.
By definition, a country is said to have a <em>comparative advantage</em> over another, when they can produce a certain good or service at a lower marginal or opportunity cost.
