the industry a set of offerings belongs to.
Answer:
Kelly Pitney
Explanation: Amount in $
May 3. Cash Dr.4,500
Unearned Revenue Cr.4,500
May 5. Cash Dr.2,450
Advance fee Cr.2,450
May 9.
Advertisement Expense Dr. 225
Cash Cr.225
May 13. Stationary Dr. 640
Cash Cr.640
May 15. Account Receivable Dr. 9,180
Service Revenue Cr. 9,180
May 16. Salaries Expense Dr.750
Cash Cr.750
May 17. Cash Dr.8,360
Service Revenue Cr.8,360
May 20. Supplies Dr.735
Supplies Payable Cr.735
May 21. Account Receivable Dr.4,820
Service Revenue Cr.4,820
May 25. Cash Dr.7,900
Service Revenue Cr.7,900
May 27. Cash Dr.9,520
Account Receivable Cr.9,520
May 28. Salaries Expense Dr.750
Cash Cr.750
May 30-31. Utility bill-Telephone Dr.260
Utility bill- Electricity Dr.810
Cash Cr.1,070
May 31. Cash Dr.3,300
Service Revenue Cr.3,300
May 31. Account Receivable Dr.2,650
Service Revenue Cr.2,650
May 31. Drawings Dr.10,500
Cash Cr.10,500
b. Trail Balance
Kelly Pitney
For the moth of May
Amount in $
Dr. Cr.
Cash 22,095
Unearned Revenue 6,950
Advertisement Expense 225
Stationary Expense 640
Account Receivable 7,130
Service Revenue 36,210
Salaries Expense 1,500
Supplies Payable 735
Supplies Expense 735
Electricity Expense 810
Telephone Expense 260
Drawings 10,500
Total 43,895 43,895
Answer:
A. National-security argument
Explanation:
The National-security argument is also known as the National-defense argument. The argument proposes the imposition of high tariffs on locally manufactured goods so that the country would not be dependent on other countries for those goods in the event of war. For example, if a country is dependent on other counties for the production of food, then it would be in great danger in the advent of war. Tires that are also used to prepare weapons should be sourced within a country so that in the advent of war, the country would not be dependent on others.
This is the argument employed by the congresswoman who sought the imposition of a tariff on tires so that the United States would not be dependent on other foreign countries during a war.
Answer:
Find attached question with multiple choices
The third option ,72,000 shares, is the correct answer.
Explanation:
A stock split refers to redenomination of shares by increasing the number of shares and proportionately reducing the number par value per share.
A 3-1 share split means that one prior share now commands three shares while the price of one share is apportioned between the three shares
Robinson now 3/1*24,000 shares=72,000 shares
One previous share was $1 par value but the three new shares would $1/3=$0.33 per share instead of the previous $1 par value
