Answer: when the president’s party loses control in either house,
The President is one of the most powerful people in the world. The Constitution says, he must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed."
The powers of the president are conducting diplomatic relations, negotiating treaties, and appointing cabinet officers. The President usually experience reduction on these powers
when the president’s party loses control in either house,
The only two possible options that could be feasible in this particular question would be B: The economy is doing poorly, with high unemployment rates, and D: The number and severity of international crises is increasing. The explanation for this would be that in both instances, people are very much aware of the role of the President as the main policy maker, and the one responsible for these two factors. If in both instances things fail, then the people might choose to vote in the legislative elections, for the opposing party, which would mean that political power would be lost, as it is now being split between the leading party in Congress and the one to which the President belongs. In this instance, now that the President doesn´t hold control of Congress, they can start vetoing his policies and decisions. Thus, in this way, the President would see a reduction in his/her political power.
The one explanation for this fact based on the above statement is "Congress has authorized the use of military force without the support of the president." Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
Answer: The United States had many reasons for going to war in 1812: Britain's interference with its trade and impressment of its seamen; Americans' desire to expand settlement into Indian, British, and Spanish territories; aspirations to conquer Canada and end British influence in North America;
driven by economic ambitions and a sense that the United States was “destined” to span the entire continent, the war also raised the issue of how acquisition of such a large territory would affect the balance between slave and free states.
