James’s position was a trustee
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Alaska close to the north pole and it is cold because it is so far from the equator so yes the southern states.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
Individuals own the development factors and respond to the three economic issues. Any of the output factors are owned by the government.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Please mark me as Brainlineast.
The answer is "according to <span>multiple trace theory".
Multiple trace theory (MTT) refers to a memory consolidation demonstrate progressed as an elective model to quality hypothesis. It places that each time some data is displayed to a man, it is neurally encoded in a novel memory follow made out of a mix of its traits.
</span>
