"there are things the want to talk about" maybe? are there choices if not that's ok but if there are they would be highly appreciated thank you
Sentence 3 is the one that appropriately inserts a hyphen to move to the next line. Macie put forth a lot of effort every day to pursue her dream of playing professional softball.
How should a hyphen be used to move to the next line?
When a word cannot fit in a line, a hyphen is used to separate the word.
When a writer has to separate a word into syllables in order to go to the next line, they should use a hyphen. A one-syllable word cannot be divided according to the hyphen rule.
The erroneous usage of the hyphen is evident in Sentence 1 when "r" is separated from "detector."
The hyphen should have been placed between straw and berries in Sentence 2.
Joy is a one-syllable word in Sentence 4.
Learn more about Detector brainly.com/question/13155639
#SPJ9
The response is determined by quite a few factors such as
the party of the key senator, the temperament of the Senate, the explanations
against the appointment, the superiority of the nominee and the relation of the
President with the Senate.
Answer: Rule of law
Explanation:
The rule of law is basically refers to the various types of society laws which is basically created by the government. The main benefits of the rule of law is that it helps in preventing the different types of traits due the huge human population.
It also helps in improving the efficiency and the production of the countries by generating various types of rules or laws for the welfare of the environment and society.
According to the given question, the rule of law is one of the type of legal notion where the power of the government are limited.
Therefore, Rule of law is the correct answer.
A significant understanding of international trade theory is that when countries interchange goods and services one with the other, it is usually beneficial to both countries. In relation to international economics, if there are huge differences in wage levels among countries then trade is probable to be harmful to neither country. The cost and benefit analysis of international trade emphases consideration on engagements of interest in countries. Since the end of world war II, the interpretation contained by the advances democracies regarding the quantity of trade has lately been interrogated by a largely political movement collected of traditional nationalists and new ideologues.
