Answer:
What is the fine print of form we-4
Explanation:
explain more so i can anwer
Answer:
<h3>C) is a term that is synonymous with rotation in office.</h3>
Explanation:
- The Spoils system was a system that gave victorious parties the right to distributed administrative offices to its own party members and supporters.
- Similar to the change in the elective members of the government, the spoils system was also based on the concept of 'rotation in office'. According to spoils system, the administrative offices and positions can be filled by the members of victorious party.
- The failure to separate administration from politics gave provisions to spoils system.
Answer:
a.Supply and demand is a constantly changing system. The mentioned that Mexico supplies about 45% of the world's avocados, which is a huge number in global trade. When they had a harvest shortage, and since its such a popular food demand, Mexico can charge whatever they want to because its needed so bad. For example, I have 5 avocados that I normally would sell for $1 but 20 people want them. I can then charge them $6 (or whatever I want) because I know people will buy them and people want them. That's Mexico's avocado supply and demand
b. avocados are naturally healthy. Most of the healthy fat in avocado is oleic acid, a monounsaturated fatty acid. This heart-healthy fat helps lower cardiovascular inflammation. They also contain important vitamins like C,E, and K. They also can be used as a food substitute, instead of using butter some people I know use avocado. A combination of increased availability, strategic marketing, and social media has made the avocado more popular and more people will want it
Explanation:
Answer: the Alps and the Apennines,
Two mountain ranges, the Alps and the Apennines, helped to protect Rome from invasion. The Apennines divide the Italian peninsula in half and, according to SPQR Online, allowed the Romans to mass forces for counter-attack whenever they were threatened.
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
