All categories

3 years ago

If a stricter quota, such as 30,000 tons of apricots, was imposed on this market, we would expect:

1 answer:

8 0

Base on the given situation above, if there is a presence of stricter quota such as with the 30,000 tons of apricots to be provided and was imposed on a market, it is expected that quantity demand and the imports in the market to decrease even if the domestic quantity and price that has been provided will increase.

You might be interested in

What would be the purchase price for a $5,000, 91-day T-bill paying 3% interest?

Nat2105 [25]

Well, you just need to find it using this formula :

5,000 x [100 % - (3% x 91/365)]

= 5,000 x [ 100 % - 0.007479]

= 5,000 x 99.992521

= $ 4,962.50 >>> rounded

Hope this help

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

User add controls to a form

mixas84 [53]

Do you have a question about it?

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Khadimally, Incorporated, expects sales of $763,500 next year. The net profit margin is 5.3 percent and the firm has a dividend

Nutka1998 [239]

Based on the expected sales, net profit margin, and dividend payout ratio, the projected increase in retained earnings for Khadimally Inc, is $33,181.71.

<h3>What is the projected increase in retained earnings?</h3>

First find the expected profit:

= Sales x Net profit margin

= 763,500 x 5.3%

= $40,465.50

The projected increase is:

= 40,465.50 x (1 - 18%)

= $33,181.71

Find out more on retained earnings at brainly.com/question/25998979.

3 0

2 years ago

A jury must decide whether a defendant, already judged should receive the death penalty. They are told that the defendant commit

Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

d.mitigating

Explanation:

This is a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor is a fact of relevance as it can reveal the motivations of the crime. Although not sufficient to absorb the defendant, except in cases of self-defense, when there is evidence of mitigating factors, this can be used to soften a defendant's penalty if it is proven that the motive for the crime was not misleading. A good example is the case in which the defendant committed a murder, and he was sentenced to death, but there is a mitigating factor: the defendant suffered physical abuse for years and killed his attacker. The jury can understand that the defendant committed the crime due to the suffering caused by the victim, which would be different from a crime motivated by trite motives. Thus, the death penalty can be understood as disproportionate and it can be reversed to a less severe penalty.

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose you borrow $9,875 and then repay the loan by making 12 monthly payments of $863.58 each. What is the effective annual ra

slava [35]

Answer:

9.38%

Explanation:

PV = $9,875

PMT = $863.58

NPER = 12

<em>Using the MS Rate Function to derive the Periodic rate </em>

Periodic rate = Rate(NPER, -PMT, PV)

Periodic rate = Rate(12, -863.58, 9,875)

Periodic rate = 0.0075

Periodic rate = 0.75%

Nominal rate = Periodic rate * NPER

Nominal rate = 0.75% * 12

Nominal rate = 9%

<em>Using the MS Effect Function to derive the effective annual rate (EAR)</em>

Nominal rate = 9%

NPER = 12

Effective annual rate (EAR) = Effect(Nominal rate, NPER)

Effective annual rate (EAR) = Effect(9%, 12)

Effective annual rate (EAR) = 0.0938

Effective annual rate (EAR) = 9.38%

So, the the effective annual rate (EAR) you are paying is 9.38%.

5 0

3 years ago