Answer:
I. Viewing many television programs that associate successful males with football
III. Operant conditioning
IV. Gender schemata
Explanation:
As we can see in the question above, the boy contracted a very wrong custom of associating virility with his ability and taste for playing football. According to the boy, he is only manly and manly enough boys who like and know how to play football.
This thought (which is extremely wrong) occurs with the influence of some things. The first is the frequency with which this boy watches many television programs that show men, soccer players with a successful and well-established career.
The second influence is the result of operant conditioning, which is a psychological concept characterized by a form of learning that allows a person to associate a situation with a punishment. In this case, the boy associates the lack of skill and the lack of interest in football with words that cause embarrassment as punishment. For this reason, he calls his colleagues who don't like football "sissy".
The third influence occurs through gender schemes, which is a term used to describe the separation of things, activities and behavior as feminine and masculine, in addition to determining that only women can do what is considered feminine and only men can do what it's male. The boy associates football with masculinity and those who do not like or have no interest in football are feminine, effeminate and not men.
Answer: Compensate for the risk
Explanation:
The compensate risk is one of the type of risk control that helps in illustrating the given example of squad as they wants to cross the bridge so the leader of the squad are concern about the various types of associate risk and the hazards regarding the problem.
The compensate risk is one of the concept that helps in typically adjusting with the given situation and risk and managing the given situation effectively. As, the platoon commander directing all the instruction to the squad so they effectively manage given problem.
Therefore, Compensate for the risk is the correct answer.
I want to say animals, but I'm leaning towards the elders of the tribes.
Congress would most likely rely on the following:
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution declares the laws of the Constitution as supreme over state laws. In the case of conflict, federal law takes precedence over state laws and state constitutions. This cqn be found in Article 6, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.
States would most likely rely on:
The nullification theory allowing states to nullify federal laws they find as unconstitutional, or interposition the right of a state to interpose between the states citizens and the federal government.
The school of thought which is most likely to focus on how schools socialize students with the appropriate values to help them find a job after graduation is Functionalism.
The Functionalism was recognized as the school of thought which highly focused on how education served the needs of society through development of skills, encouraging social cohesion and sorting of the students.
The functionalists believed that the role of schools is to prepare students and socialize students with the appropriate values for participation in the institutions of society.
The Functionalists believed that the purpose of schooling was of intellectual, as in order to gain cognitive skills, and inquiry skills. Also, the economic purpose, to prepare students for later work roles in life.
Hence, the school of thought which is most likely to focus on how schools socialize students is Functionalism.
To learn more about the Functionalism here:
brainly.com/question/26203347
#SPJ4
