All categories

3 years ago

Students were asked to write 6x + Xx - 3x +

Mathematics

1 answer:

Anastasy [175]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Sorry

Step-by-step explanation:

Where are the answer of the four students?

You might be interested in

What is the correct answer to x^2+y^2+4x-2y=-1

alexdok [17]

Answer:

hold on the answer in the picture

Step-by-step explanation:

sry for it being so blurry

5 0

3 years ago

What simple interest rate would allow $6000 to grow to an amount of $14550 in 10 years?

Harman [31]

Answer:

$\boxed{ \bold{ \huge{ \boxed{ \sf{ \: 14.25 \: \% \: }}}}}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

Principal ( P ) = $ 6000

Amount ( A ) = $ 14550

Time ( T ) = 10 years

Rate ( R ) = ?

Finding the Interest

The sum of principal and interest is called an amount.

From the definition,

$\boxed{ \sf{Amount = \: Principal + Interest}}$

plug the values

⇒ $\sf{14550 = 6000 + Interest}$

Swap the sides of the equation

⇒ $\sf{6000 + Interest = 14550}$

Move 6000 to right hand side and change its sign

⇒ $\sf{Interest = 14550 - 6000}$

Subtract 6000 from 14550

⇒ $\sf{Interest = \: 8550 \: }$

Interest = $ 8550

Finding the rate 

${ \boxed{ \sf{Rate = \frac{Interest \times 100}{Principal \times Time}}}}$

plug the values

⇒ $\sf{ Rate = \frac{8550 \times 100}{6000 \times 10} }$

Calculate

⇒ $\sf{Rate = \frac{855000}{60000} }$

⇒ $\sf{Rate = 14.25 \: \% \: }$

Hope I helped!

Best regards!!

8 0

3 years ago

−5/8+3/4 equals what, In fraction form.

kipiarov [429]

How to get answer by Mimiwhatsup (In Decimal Form):

$-5/8+3/4\\\mathrm{Divide\:the\:numbers:}\:5\div \:8=0.625\\=-0.625+3\div \:4\\\mathrm{Divide\:the\:numbers:}\:3\div \:4=0.75\\=-0.625+0.75\\\mathrm{Add/Subtract\:the\:numbers:}\:-0.625+0.75=0.125\\=0.125$

Answer in Fraction Form: $\frac{1}{8}$

7 0

3 years ago

I am giving Brainiest Answer +25 points to anyone who can answer these correctly, try you're best and take you're time :)

Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

1. 1,728m

2. 570cm

3. 748mm

4. 37mL

5. 65mL

6. 2.3mL

6 0

3 years ago

Will improving customer service result in higher stock prices for the companies providing the better service? "When a company’s

Orlov [11]

Question:

Company 2007 Score 2008 Score

Rite Aid 73 76

Expedia 75 77

J.C. Penney 77 78

a. For Rite Aid, is the increase in the satisfaction score from 2007 to 2008 statistically significant? Use α= .05. What can you conclude?

b. Can you conclude that the 2008 score for Rite Aid is above the national average of 75.7? Use α= .05.

c. For Expedia, is the increase from 2007 to 2008 statistically significant? Use α= .05.

d. When conducting a hypothesis test with the values given for the standard deviation,

sample size, and α, how large must the increase from 2007 to 2008 be for it to be statistically significant?

e. Use the result of part (d) to state whether the increase for J.C. Penney from 2007 to 2008 is statistically significant.

Answer:

a. There is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the increase in satisfaction score for Rite Aid from 2007 to 2008 is statistically significant

b. There is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the 2008 Rite Aid score, is above the national average of 75.7

c. The statistical evidence support the claim of a significant increase from 2007 to 2008

d. 1.802 and above is significant

e. The increase of J. C. Penney from 2007 is not statistically significant.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have

n = 60

σ = 6

μ₁ = 73

μ₂ = 76

We put H₀ : μ₁ ≥ μ₂ and

Hₐ : μ₁ < μ₂

From which we have;

$z=\frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}} = \frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}}}$

Plugging in the values we have

$z = \frac{(73-76)}{\sqrt{\frac{2\times 6^{2} }{60_{}}}}} = -2.7386$

The probability, P from z function computation gives;

P(Z < -2.7386) = 0.0031

Where we have P < α, we reject the null hypothesis meaning that there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the increase in satisfaction score for Rite Aid from 2007 to 2008 is statistically significant

b. To test here, we have

H₀ : μ ≤ 75.7

Hₐ : μ > 75.7

The test statistic is given as follows;

$z=\frac{\bar{x}-\mu }{\frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n}}} = \frac{76-75.7 }{\frac{6 }{\sqrt{60}}} = 0.3873$

Therefore, we have the probability, P given as the value for the function at z = 0.3873 that is we have;

P = P(Z > 0.3873) = P(Z < -0.3873) = 0.3493

Therefore, since P > α which is 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, that is there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the 2008 Rite Aid score, is above the national average of 75.7

c. Here we put

Null hypothesis H₀ : μ₁ ≥ μ₂

Alternative hypothesis Hₐ : μ₁ < μ₂

The test statistic is given by the following equation;

$z=\frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}} = \frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}}}$

Plugging in the values we have

$z = \frac{(75-77)}{\sqrt{\frac{2\times 6^{2} }{60_{}}}}} = -1.8257$

The probability, P from z function computation gives;

P(Z < -1.8257) = 0.03394

The statistical evidence support the claim of a significant increase

d. For statistical significance at 0.05 significant level, we have z = -1.644854

Therefore, from;

$z=\frac{(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}})-(\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}-\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}$ . we have;

$z \times \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}} + (\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{} ={(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}})$

Which gives

${(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}}) = z \times \sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}} + (\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{} = -1.644854 \times \sqrt{\frac{2\times 6_{}^{2} }{60_{}}}} + 0 = -1.802$

Therefore an increase of 1.802 and above is significant

e. Based on the result of part d. we have for J.C. Penney from 2007 to 2008 an increase of 1 which is less than 1.802 at 5% significant level, is not significant.

5 0

3 years ago