Charlie used a regression calculator to generate the equation f(x) = –0.15x + 20.1 for the ordered pairs (2, 15), (4, 21), (6, 2

Question

2 years ago

9

Charlie used a regression calculator to generate the equation f(x) = –0.15x + 20.1 for the ordered pairs (2, 15), (4, 21), (6, 2

6), (8, 20), and (10, 14). Is a linear representation the best way to represent the data? If it is, explain why. If not, explain why and suggest a better alternative

Mathematics

2 answers:

aivan3 [116] · Answer 1 · 2022-08-07T20:43:43+03:00

Answer: The r<span>-value for the linear function related to the ordered pairs is very close to zero, so it is not a good representation of the data. A quadratic model would better represent the data because there is a turning point within the data set. The data increases then decreases, which is what the graph of a quadratic does. </span>

Crazy boy [7] · Answer 2 · 2022-08-07T22:21:40+03:00

Answer:

The r-value for the linear function related to the ordered pairs is very close to zero, so it is not a good representation of the data. A quadratic model would better represent the data because there is a turning point within the data set. The data increases then decreases, which is what the graph of a quadratic does.

Step-by-step explanation: