1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adoni [48]
3 years ago
8

"The Church of England is too full of Roman Catholic traditions and teachings, and thus cannot possibly be purified. The only wa

y to practice pure religion, based on the Bible's sermons, is to break away from the Church. I am going to move to Plymouth Colony where I can practice my religion properly." Who would have most likely spoken the statement above? a Catholic
History
2 answers:
Fed [463]3 years ago
7 0

The correct option is D) a Separatist.

<em>The group that would have most likely spoken the statement above is a separatist.</em>

In the 16th and 17th century, the terms Separatist meant that people wanted to separate from the church of England to form other churches that were independent. The English Protestants of that time grew tired of the corruption they saw in the church of England. That is why on the passage we read that "the only way we can practice pure religion, based on the Bible's Sermons, is to break away from the church..."

The other options of the question were a) Catholic, b) Protestant, and c) Puritan.

m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago
6 0
The most likely spoken the statement above is the Separatist. The separatist believed that the original religious organization has been mixed with the interest of politic and power. so they thought the only way to stay pure is by separating themselves with the original churches
You might be interested in
Traditional Japanese poetry is called
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

its called a haiku

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How about this weather
Cloud [144]
It's 100 degrees out here I'm burning up
7 0
3 years ago
How did Militarism and Nationalism lead to World War 1?
PolarNik [594]
Nationalism was a great cause of World War one because of countries being greedy and not negotiating. Nationalism shows you are proud of your country and want it to be the best. A lot of causes all linked back to countries all wanted to be better than each other. Nationalist groups in Austria-Hungary and Serbia wanted independence. France wanted Alsace Lorraine back from Germany who was lost in 1871 Franco-Prussian war. The use of Nationalism gave nations false hope and aggressive to win the war. Even if they weren’t able to win a war due to their strength and understanding of plans and leaders. This leads to Imperialism. As you can see Nationalism had made a big dent in Countries understanding and strength of war. Also how different countries wanted land to help their plan succeed in winning the war.


Militarism could have cause the war due to the naval and arms race. The main event of Militarism causing World War one was the naval rivalry which was made after 1900. Britain had the most powerful navy in the world. The new Keiser Wilhelm announced his intention to build a bigger German navy than Britain. Britain felt very threatened by this. Germany’s navy was much smaller than Britain’s navy but the British army was put all over its colonies so they can be protected. Germany didn’t have a big Empire like Britain but most people agreed, at the time, they were the best trained and the most powerful. The Kaiser felt he needed a bigger navy than Britain to protect its country.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain a significant difference between the Iroquois and European groups that might lead to a conflict.
Ber [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Explain a significant difference between the Iroquois and European groups that might lead to a conflict.

Basically, one of the biggest differences between the Iroquois Native American Indians and the French was that the Indians wanted to be in the position of middlemen in the lucrative fur trade between the Europeans and French and the other tribes that lived in the west. This period of history in the North American territories was known as the French and Indian Wars, from 1642 to 1698. The Algonquin tribe supported the French because they had good trade relationships with them. The Algonquin fought against the Mohawk.

4 0
3 years ago
Transcontinental railroad offect us by
Alisiya [41]
The goal of the transcontinental railroad was to connect the eastern part of the United States to the western part. Both the Central Pacific and the Union Pacific Railroad companies worked to build this long railroad. Some positive effects of the transcontinental railroad included more efficient transportation from coast to coast, a faster spreading of ideas throughout the United States, and increases in global and intercontinental trade. A negative effect of the transcontinental railroad was that racial tensions among Native Americans and other groups arose. 
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the civil war, women in both the South and North served as
    11·1 answer
  • How how did Herbert Hoover earned the nickname the great humanitarian
    13·1 answer
  • The concursive approach to inspiration attempts to take what into account
    13·1 answer
  • What was Samuel Morse known for?
    8·1 answer
  • How do u think judicial review would effect the relation, Congress and the court?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the Soviets think that Western nations might invade the Soviet Union after
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Russia leave the war in 1917?
    7·2 answers
  • Heritage Images/Getty Images
    8·1 answer
  • The chart shows data on the construction of dreadnoughts, or armed battleships, by 1914.A 3-column table with 6 rows titled Drea
    15·1 answer
  • How has the population in Ghana changed from how it was thousands of years ago?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!