Answer:
The term is Marginal Propensity to Consume.
Explanation:
Marginal propensity to consume refers to the extra consumption people engage in, in proportion to the extra amount of disposable income that they recieve. In other words, it is the rate at which they consume their disposable income rather than save it.
For example, if I obtain extra $10 of disposable income, and consume (spend) $8, and save the remaining $2, my marginal propensity to consume is 0.2 or 20%.
Answer: b/c fewer people may stay at hotels
Explanation:
i’m pretty sure this is the only logical reason
Answer:
The judicial branch has no power of its own over implementation of enforcement of its rulings and is thus dependent on the other two branches to make this happen, relying on the executive to enforce its decisions and on the legislature to fund it. Hamilton said the judiciary has "no influence over either the sword or the purse" and "neither force nor will, but merely judgment," stressing the court system's reliance on assistance from the other two branches.
Explanation:
The correct answer is PPF
Explanation: PPF is a concept that discusses this economic problem and illustrates how to make choices in a situation of scarcity. This model graphically represents a hypothetical situation of how to make a choice between two goods.
California, Nevada and Utah. Also parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming. Hope this helps!
Mark Brainliest answer!! :D