The government perceived it as a horrid massacre or an unhappy disturbance.
Answer:
There is no proximate cause between the breach of duty and the injury
Explanation:
Negligence is simply defined as the inability to take the right step or precautions to protect others from the risk of harm. it concerns harm that is as a result of an accident. In any case of negligence, The plaintiff must prove his/her point with the following reasons or elements to be able to win, if not loses.they are;
1. The Duty of Care - defendant had a duty of due care to the plaintiff.
2. Breach - defendant alter or breached this duty.
3. Factual Cause - defendant's conduct actually caused the injury.
4. Foreseeable Harm - looking ahead of the conduct like the defendant's might cause this type of harm.
5. Injury - plaintiff has actually been hurt.
The great compromise and the three fifths compromise helped the convention reach agreements because they were meeting half way
Sure! Could you please put other photo that is not that blurry so I can help you?
Answer:
I believe the answer Is B, because it can't be a, or c so your answer is B.independence from great Britain.