Step-by-step explanation:
13.
132 miles in 3 h = 132miles/3hours = 132/3 miles/h =
= 44 miles/h
so,
how long for 110 miles ?
speed = distance/time
time = distance/speed = 110 miles / 44 miles/h =
= 110/44 h = 55/22 h =
= 5/2 h = 2.5 h
14.
60% = 60/100 = 6/10 = 3/5
15.
300% = 300/100 = 3
16.
116 2/3% = (348 + 2)/3% = 350/3% = 350/3/100 =
= 350/300 = 1 50/300 = 1 1/6
17.
19% = 19/100
18.
3.8% = 3.8/100 = 38/1000 = 19/500
19.
166 2/3% = (498 + 2)/3% = 500/3% = 500/3/100 =
= 500/300 = 5/3 = 1 2/3
20.
4/5 = 0.8 = 80%
21.
7/4 = 1.75 = 175%
22.
1/3 = 0.3333333... ≈ 33.33%
23.
2 = 200/100 = 200%
24.
0.4 = 40%
25.
0.375 = 37.5/100 = 37.5%
26.
80% of 60 = 60×80/100 = 60×4/5 = 48
27.
24% of 65 = 65×24/100 = 65×6/25 = 13×6/5 =
= 15.6
28.
115% of 138 = 138×115/100 = 138×23/20 =
= 69×23/10 = 158.7
29.
18.3% of 74 = 74×18.3/100 = 74×183/1000 =
= 37×183/500 = 13.542 ≈ 13.54
30.
6.5% of 115 = 115×6.5/100 = 115×65/1000 =
= 23×13/40 = 7.475 ≈ 7.48
31.
0.75% of 93 = 93×0.75/100 = 93×75/10000 =
= 93×3/400 = 0.6975 ≈ 0.70
Answer:
A sequence of transformation can move two congruent figures to the same place (vertical / horizontal shifts). This causes them to perfectly overlap, proving their congruency.
A sequence of transformations can be used to show that something is similar, because if one were to transform a figure with only shrinks / stretches, one can shrink / stretch them to make them congruent. If only shrinks or stretches were done, and if the result of the transformation is congruent to the other figure, then the figures are similar (sides are proportional and shrinking/stretching them proves proportionality to other figure).
<h3>
Answer: D. regular hexagon</h3>
A hexagon is composed of 6 congruent equilateral triangles. Each equilateral triangle has interior angle of 60 degrees. Adding 6 such angles together gets you to 360 degrees. So we've done one full rotation and covered every bit of the plane surrounding a given point. Extend this out and you'll be able to cover the plane. A similar situation happens with rectangles as well (think of a grid, or think of tiles on the wall or floor)
In contrast, a regular pentagon has interior angle 108 degrees. This is not a factor of 360, so there is no way to place regular pentagons to have them line up and not be a gap or overlap. This is why regular pentagons do not tessellate the plane. The same can be aside about decagons and octagons as well.
Answer:
C) 0.19
Step-by-step explanation:
A correlation coefficient is a measure of how well the line of best fit fits the data. The higher the correlation coefficient, up to 1.0 or -1.0, the better the fit. A positive correlation coefficient means an increasing data set, while a negative correlation coefficient means a decreasing data set.
We can see that this line of best fit is increasing, so our correlation coefficient will be positive.
However we can also see that the points are fairly scattered; this means this is not a very good fit. This means that 0.19 is the better fit.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
i got x=3.21007319
