Answer:
b. hedonic treadmill
Explanation:
Hedonic treadmill -
It refers to the human tendency to get back to a normal state of mind apart from being in some major negative or positive activity of the life, is referred to as hedonic treadmill.
Hence, from the given information of the question , Samer's experience is an example of hedonic treadmill.
Goal setting theory is an influential and practical theory and there's a strong evidence that setting goals help to improve: measured performance.
<h3>What is a goal?</h3>
A goal is simply an outcome statement and strategic objectives that defines what an individual or team hopes to successfully achieve in the future, usually over a specific period of time.
Basically, a goal refers to a futuristic idea or desired result that an individual or team envision, plan and commit to accomplish over a specific period of time.
In conclusion, we can deduce there's a strong evidence that setting goals help to improve measured performance of an individual or team.
Read more on goals here: brainly.com/question/24693533
Answer:
was an inclusive organization that advocated for a vast array of reforms
Explanation:
The Knights of Labor was an inclusive organization that advocated for a vast array of reforms. The Knight of Labour was a labour organization in the United States, it was founded in 1869 and grew to a membership of 700,000 in 1886. The aim of the union is to represent the interest of both craft and skilled labourers and protect them from exploitation, they did this by campaigning for an eight hour workday, tried to form a cooperative society in which the workers will be in control of the sector they work in. It was an inclusive organization that advocated for a vast array of labour reforms.
Answer:
c.) Over time, qualities within us change into their opposites.
Explanation:
The correct option is - c.) Over time, qualities within us change into their opposites.
Reason -
Heraclitus has very strong views :
(i) There is a constant manner in which everything change.
(ii) Opposite things are identical in nature.
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4
