1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antoniya [11.8K]
3 years ago
8

An argument of John C. Calhoun in support of nullification was that the 1828 tariff:

History
1 answer:
Travka [436]3 years ago
8 0

John Calhoun argued that the 1828 tariff helped the North at the expense of the South (c). This was the case because the tariff bolstered Northerner industrial markets but required Southerners to pay more for manufactured good.

You might be interested in
Discuss the primary assumptions of Mercantilism. Concretely illustrate how Mercantilist theory influenced both the foreign and d
slega [8]
New York City is the answer
8 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me and write out the answer​
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The constitution is a document that is the founding stone for checks and balances. The executive branch can be put in place by the judicial and legislative branch. The judicial branch can be put in place by the legislative and executive branch. The legislative branch can be put in place by the executive and judicial branch. This is checks and balances caused by the constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
Edwards v. South Carolina protected people’s right to assemble and
Marina86 [1]

Answer:

express unpopular views in a peaceful way.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the colonists feel they had the right to rebel against the British government?
Vinvika [58]

In the early days of British colonization, the British gave the colonists a lot of self governing powers and autonomy, and it remained this way for several years. However, when King George III took power he tightened the grip on their colonies a lot more, which created some tensions. One big thing was after the French and Indian War, the British heavily taxed the colonists with things like the Stamp Act because it has cost the British government a lot of money to defend the colonies in the. This angered a lot of colonists because they were getting taxed without consent in that they have no representation in Parliament. Although other British colonies also did not have representation, the colonists felt that they were just as valid as British citizens as those in GB, so they were angry that they had to pay all these taxes without agreeing to them. Hence the phrase "no taxation without representation"

3 0
3 years ago
Help!!
CaHeK987 [17]
Heyo, I believe your answer would be B. increased over each decade.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between the central plains and the great plains?
    5·1 answer
  • The point of maximum profit is the which marginal cost equals the
    8·2 answers
  • The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind.
    13·1 answer
  • What country was the last to settle in North America?
    10·1 answer
  • What did enlightenment thinkers believe that contributed to changes in relationships between citizens and governments
    11·2 answers
  • What long-term impact did the invention of the seed drill have on great britain?
    14·2 answers
  • Identify the names below associated with the following statements:
    5·2 answers
  • Which individual was a influential leader of progressivism?
    6·1 answer
  • FREEEEE POINTSSS WHOOP WHOOP
    11·2 answers
  • Help pls
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!