1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
storchak [24]
3 years ago
8

A 50 year old customer receives an inheritance of $1,000,000 which he places with an investment adviser to invest with the objec

tive of safety of principal and a moderate level of income. As of the end of the first year, the portfolio is worth $1,300,000. As of the end of the second year, the portfolio is worth $1,200,000. Ignoring compounding, the approximate annual return on investment is:
Business
1 answer:
AfilCa [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: 10%

Explanation:

Given that :

Worth of investment = $1,000,000

Worth after 1 year = $1,300,000

Worth after 2 years = $1,200,000

From the above, investment recorded $300,000 increase after one year and $100,000 Depreciation at the end of the second year.

Therefore, Net increase:

$300,000 - $100,000 = $200,000 (after 2 years)

Therefore, average yearly/annual increase = $200,000 / 2 = $100,000

Therefore, the annual return on the investment is :

(Annual increase / investment worth) × 100%

(100,000 : 1,000,000) × 100%

0.1 × 100% = 10%

= 10%

You might be interested in
Which country use tax brackets as a part of their tax system
konstantin123 [22]
Canada, Australia, and South Africa use tax brackets.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Our company sells flat screen tvs to retailers for $1,000. The total fixed costs for plant operation is $60,000. It costs us $70
Sedbober [7]

Answer:

<h3><em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>o</u></em></h3>

Explanation:

<em>s</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>e</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>,</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em>

4 0
2 years ago
The stock of Mulberry Corporation is owned by Archana (60%) and Anar (40%), who are mother and daughter. Pursuant to a plan of c
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

There is loss of $109,120

Explanation:

Lossrecognized=Marketvalue−Purchasevalue

=$1773200-1364000

Therefore, loss recognized by “M” Corporation is $409,200

Determine the gain or loss of A:

LossbyA=Purchasevalue−Liability−ActualbasisofM

=[($1364000-$1091200)×40%]−$218240

=$109120−$218240

=($109,120)  loss

​

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are the CEO of a company that has to choose between making a $100 million investment in either Russia or Poland. Both invest
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.

Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.

Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.

8 0
3 years ago
The original cost of a LIFO inventory item is below both replacement cost and net realizable value. The net realizable value les
serg [7]

Answer:

D. Original cost.

Explanation:

As we know that the inventory should be valued at lower of cost or market value. Also , the market value is the middle amount among the replacement cost, net realizable value, net realizable value - normal profit margin

It can be the replacement cost or net realizable value. We don't have an idea which one is the middle amount

Also, if the original cost is less than the market cost so we assume that the inventory should be valued at original cost

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "Bourne Incorporated reports a cash balance at the end of the month of $2,620. A comparison of the company's cash records with t
    7·1 answer
  • A manager buys three shares of stock today, and then sells one of those shares each year for the next 3 years. His actions and t
    14·1 answer
  • A new intelligence test has been devised. an adults shoe size is divided by 6 and multiplied by 100. this test would be consider
    6·1 answer
  • Funds acquired by the firm through retaining earnings have no cost because there are no dividend or interest payments associated
    11·2 answers
  • When using project management software, estimates of work time should be entered only at the work package level; the rest of the
    12·1 answer
  • Butter melts when you heat it in a pan
    10·1 answer
  • Bedford had this info at the end of 2015, its first year of operations: No other permanent or temporary differences exist. The l
    15·1 answer
  • Within her company, maria utilizes a management style that varies according to the individual and environmental situation, with
    9·2 answers
  • Hey...tal.k anyone ......
    14·2 answers
  • How does the us economy differ from pure capitalism.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!