Answer:
Explanation:
In order to calculate he present value or worth of this bond we woulñd have to make the following calculations:
Face value (FV) $ 1,000.00
Coupon rate 8.50%
Number of compounding periods per year 2
Interest per period (PMT) $ 42.50
Number of years to maturity 8
Number of compounding periods till maturity (NPER) 16
Market rate of return/Required rate of return per period (RATE) 5.00%
Therefore, Bond price= PV(RATE,NPER,PMT,FV)*-1
Bond present worth=$918.72
The present value or worth of this bond is $918.72
The first one the third one and possibly the last one. I'm unsure about the last one because depending on the amount of scorpions that are hunted, the food web in that area could be negatively impacted.
Answer:
$4,927
Explanation:
The computation of tax liability is shown below:-
Suta wage base is $28,200. So, income besides $28,200 is not subject to Suta tax.
Total taxable income = Annabelle + Beatrice + Michael + Howard
= $28,200 + $24,880 + $28,200 + $28,200
= $109,480
Suta tax liability = Total taxable income × Tax rate
=$109,480 × 4.5%
= $4,927
So, for computing the Suta tax liability we simply multiply the total taxable income with tax rate.
Answer:
d.mitigating
Explanation:
This is a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor is a fact of relevance as it can reveal the motivations of the crime. Although not sufficient to absorb the defendant, except in cases of self-defense, when there is evidence of mitigating factors, this can be used to soften a defendant's penalty if it is proven that the motive for the crime was not misleading. A good example is the case in which the defendant committed a murder, and he was sentenced to death, but there is a mitigating factor: the defendant suffered physical abuse for years and killed his attacker. The jury can understand that the defendant committed the crime due to the suffering caused by the victim, which would be different from a crime motivated by trite motives. Thus, the death penalty can be understood as disproportionate and it can be reversed to a less severe penalty.
Answer:
The answer is: Cobalt Sodas is not dealing with its main problem, which is the shift in consumer behavior
Explanation:
The main issue that Cobalt Sodas (CS) must address is the change in consumer behavior and to do this they must diversify their product lines.
Consumers are less interested now in beverages that are seen as unhealthy. They want to buy beverages considered to be healthy, so CS should start to develop a new product line of healthy beverages. If they sell "old style" cans that wouldn´t have a lasting positive impact. Maybe at the beginning they sell more cans but eventually their sales will keep falling until they diversity their product lines.
