This statement would be more or less correct I would say.
Nationalism inded did develop strongly in the 19th century, and also in a lot of cases led into the development of nation states. At the same time, powerful empires that existed in those times had often many different ethnic and political groups in their borders. All of these factors often led to different wars that were quite horrible.
Answer:
pros- It provides a clean, widely accepted ending to the election
-It keeps smaller states relevant in national politics.
cons-It can make people feel like their votes don’t matter.
- It gives too much power to swing states.
Explanation:
As a judge, i would rule in favor if Bakilana
By confiscating her password and forcing her to work for long hours, Bakilana had cause intentional infliction of emotional distress toward kiwanuka.
Bakilana has intentionally inflicted emotional distress to Kiwanuka by taking extreme/outrageous conduct such as taking her passwords and mentally abuse Kiwanuka.
But, that's being said, Kiwanuka does not present any proof about her accusation. (recording or witnesses). If Kiwanuka provide them, as a judge I will rule in favour of her. But since there is still a reasonable doubt that the accusation is false, i would rule in favor of Bakilana.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
im just here to verify it but credits to answer above
