Answer:
What Paul has done wrong is to place these marketing materials on seats. He should devised a plan to give out these materials at the registration point where participants would be registered and then they would collect the items. By placing them on the seats, some of the participants could collect more than one, especially the valuable pen that is worth $3 each.
Explanation:
Marketing materials cost the entity some funds to produce. They should not be wasted. In addition, the number of participants with some details like names and contact information should be captured for future marketing efforts. Allowing participants to have free access to the marketing materials that cost so much without driving any potential customer list is not prudent.
Answer:
There are 211 quarters and 216 dimes
Explanation:
To answer this question, we need to properly understand what a dime is and what a quarter is. A quarter is 25 cents while a dime is 10 cents in value.
Let the number of dimes present be d and the number of quarters present be q.
We are told that he has 5 more dimes than quarters.
Mathematically, this means that:
d - q = 5 or d = q+ 5 .......(I)
The total value there is $74.35. In cents, this has a value of 7435 cents.
Mathematically:
25q + 10d = 7435......(ii)
We substitute what we have in 1 in 2
25q + 10(q+5) = 7435
25q + 10q + 50 = 7435
35q + 50 = 7435
35q = 7435-50
35q = 7385
q = 7385/35
q = 211
Recall, d = q+ 5 ; d = 211 + 5 = 216
If the statement above asks if the statement is true or false. The answer of it is true. It is organized like a pyramid because it has a benefit and is another way of organizing the bureaucracy in which it could be followed and labeled, in order for it to provide proper information and to be read clearly and in an organized way.
Answer: c.the policy is neither legally nor ethically sound
Explanation:
You cannot reply discrimination with reverse discrimination because it is still discrimination. What the company just did was to pay Jews more money simply because they were Jews or rather people who practice Judaism and pay those who don't practice it less. That is not ethical because it is discrimination in the work place
The US Constitution holds that all people be treated equal and paying people different amounts owing to their ethnicity contravenes the Constitution and is therefore illegal.
Even if they had good intentions at heart, what they did was illegal, unethical and can even be considered bribery to get back on the good side of the people practicing Judaism.
Answer:
Sorry to hear that, hopefully they'll be quiet one day.
Explanation: