It's true the slaughterhouse cases are an example of the supreme court whittling away at the freedoms gained by the blacks during reconstruction.
Option A) is true.
The Supreme Court decision in the 1873 Slaughterhouse Case was a setback for African Americans. Because the court held that the most basic civil rights of Americans were acquired through state citizenship, and the Amendment did not protect those rights. legislation.
The Slaughterhouse Cases, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1873, limited the "privileges and immunities" of citizens protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to states to those provided for in the Constitution. and many held that they did not involve individuals. State Rights.
Learn more about slaughterhouse case at
brainly.com/question/9354360
#SPJ4
A population of bobcats depends on these rabbits for food.
False pretense must be interpreted by the courts and some circumstances automatically qualify as a false pretense, such as bigamy, when one of the parties is married already. This breaks the marriage contract and qualifies for a voiding of the marriage. Claiming to be 'with child', is a false pretense if a child is not born within 10 months of marriage. Impotence may qualify for a false pretense ruling under certain circumstances. If the courts decide your marriage should never have taken place then you make seek an annulment. The best advice is to visit a lawyer.
Answer:
b. cost-related
Explanation:
Direct foreign investment is a way of investment by a firm or an individual which is made in one country into the business interests available in the other country.
In the context, country with low income and high rate of unemployment is a high target by the United States's firms because of cost related motives as the firm who makes investment and engages employees to work are likely to pay less as wages to its employees. It will give benefits to the firm in relation to the cost.
