The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
When Joseph sees a frail man limping around the corner he owns, he will likely help if the costs of helping are small and Joseph will feel better about himself helping.
Helping someone in need corresponds to a form of empathy and altruism, which is based on the moral emotions we feel when we see a person in a situation that we have the ability to help.
According to the theory of social exchange, altruism only exists if the benefits to the helper outweigh the cost, so supported by this theory, the letter b is correct, and Joseph will help the man if the costs of helping are small.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/14669414
Answer:
People can take there clothes that don't fit and have a parent drive around and see if the homeless people can wear them. And give them old blankets and pillows that yall aren't using anymore. Make cookies, sandwhiches, soups and give drinks. Maybe also some extra hats, gloves, and coats to. That would be nice to do.
