What can you add to 70 to make 90

-8x+7-6(x-1)=-6x-(7x-5)+6 can some one please help me out this problems are kicking my behind thanks I really appreciate it

rosijanka [135]

-8x+7-6(x-1)=-6x-(7x-5)+6
-8x+7-6x+6=-6x-7x+5+6
use gemdas to add like terms
-14x+13=-13x+11
+14x. +14x
13= x+11
-11 -11
2=x

6 0

4 years ago

A man has a certain unknown sum of money, 60% of that sum Is 4800 rupees. What is the sum of money?

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

8000

Step-by-step explanation:

I did a simple way, I divided 4800 by 3 and got 1600, then multiplied 1600 by 5. Because 2x5 =10 (or 100%)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A manufacturer of a new medication on the market for Alzheimer's disease makes a claim that the medication is effective in 65% o

NeX [460]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.639 -0.65}{\sqrt{\frac{0.65(1-0.65)}{180}}}=-0.309$

$p_v =P(z$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of adults with the medication was effective is not significantly less than 0.65

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=180 represent the random sample taken

X=115 represent the adults with the medication was effective

$\hat p=\frac{115}{180}=0.639$ estimated proportion of adults with the medication was effective

$p_o=0.65$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that true proportion is less than 0.65.:

Null hypothesis: $p \geq 0.65$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.65$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.639 -0.65}{\sqrt{\frac{0.65(1-0.65)}{180}}}=-0.309$

Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of adults with the medication was effective is not significantly less than 0.65

3 0

3 years ago

Out of every 1000 packages received by a merchant, three are damaged. In a day, the merchant received 600 damaged packages. How

lukranit [14]

Answer:

1.8 undamaged packages

Step-by-step explanation:

3/1000 x 600

Multiply

1.8

8 0

3 years ago

The graph of F(x) can be stretched vertically and flipped over the x axis to produce the graph of G(x) if F(x)=x^2 which of the

ladessa [460]

Answer:

g(x) = -5x²

(option B)

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that our original graph, f(x) = x² is a parabola.

So, we can consider what happens when we adjust the function/equation of a parabola.

when we "vertically stretch" a parabola, we are increasing the value of x.

think of it this way: the steepness of a slope is rise over run. If we rise ten, and run one, that's going be a lot more steep than if we rise 1, run 1.

Let's say our x = 5

if f(x)=x²

f(5) = 25

> y value / steepness is 25

f(x) = 3x²

f(5) = 75

> y value / steepness is 75

So, we are looking for an equation with an increase in x present.

When a parabola has been flipped over the x-axis, we know that the original equation now includes a negative

suppose that x = 1

if y = x² ; y = 1² = 1

if y = -(x²) ; y = -(1²) ; y = -1

So, when we set x to be negative, we make our y-values end up as negative also (which makes the graph look as if it has been flipped upside-down)

This means that we are looking for a function with a negative x value.

So, we are looking for a negative x-value that is multiplied by a number >1

The graph that fits our requirements is g(x) = -5x²

hope this helps!!

6 0

2 years ago