St Petersburg was once referred to as Petrogard till after the Russian revolution.
<h3>Where is saint Petersburg?</h3>
This [place is a historical town that is found in the Northern extreme part of Russia.
The area is known to have had a change of name after the Russian revolution of the year 1917. The town only got to be called Petrogard for a period of 10 years.
Read more on St. Petersburg here:
brainly.com/question/835600
#SPJ12
Answer:
The correct answers are
a) ways to inject capital into the economy
b) ways to encourage increased productivity
c) ways to decrease unemployment
Explanation:
In this speech, the President is talking about ways to inject capital and this can be done either through tax breaks, through stimulus packages or increasing government spending on infrastructure.
Increasing productivity is mostly a matter for private corporations, however the government can make things easier by reducing red tape and ensuring everything works smoothly.
All of this should lead to more job creation, innovation, increased investment and job creation.
Website: quizlet .com Code: 80733492
this is the website I used sorry if it doesn't work
Answer:
1) France
2) Belgium
5) Holland
Explanation:
The information is in the images below:
SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST ACT
The Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890 (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 et seq.), the first and most significant of the U.S. antitrust laws, was signed into law by President benjamin harrison and is named after its primary supporter, Ohio Senator john sherman.
The prevailing economic theory supporting antitrust laws in the United States is that the public is best served by free competition in trade and industry. When businesses fairly compete for the consumer's dollar, the quality of products and services increases while the prices decrease. However, many businesses would rather dictate the price, quantity, and quality of the goods that they produce, without having to compete for consumers. Some businesses have tried to eliminate competition through illegal means, such as fixing prices and assigning exclusive territories to different competitors within an industry. Antitrust laws seek to eliminate such illegal behavior and promote free and fair marketplace competition.Until the late 1800s the federal government encouraged the growth of big business. By the end of the century, however, the emergence of powerful trusts began to threaten the U.S. business climate. Trusts were corporate holding companies that, by 1888, had consolidated a very large share of U.S. manufacturing and mining industries into nationwide monopolies. The trusts found that through consolidation they could charge monopoly prices and thus make excessive profits and large financial gains. Access to greater political power at state and national levels led to further economic benefits for the trusts, such as tariffs or discriminatory railroad rates or rebates. The most notorious of the trusts were the Sugar Trust, the Whisky Trust, the Cordage Trust, the Beef Trust, the Tobacco Trust, John D. Rockefeller's Oil Trust (Standard Oil of New Jersey), and J. P. Morgan's Steel Trust (U.S. Steel Corporation).<span>Consumers, workers, farmers, and other suppliers were directly hurt monetarily as a result of the monopolizations. Even more important, perhaps, was that the trusts fanned into renewed flame a traditional U.S. fear and hatred of unchecked power, whether political or economic, and particularly of monopolies that ended or threatened equal opportunity for all businesses. The public demanded legislative action, which prompted Congress, in 1890, to pass the Sherman Act. The act was followed by several other antitrust acts, including the clayton act of 1914 (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 12 et seq.), the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 41 et seq.), and the robinson-patman act of 1936 (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 13a, 13b, 21a). All of these acts attempt to prohibit anticompetitive practices and prevent unreasonable concentrations of economic power that stifle or weaken competition.</span>
