Answer:
The power the government has over the military and other armed forces is extense. The government could use the military to stop a social movement or a strike. In terms of sheer ability, the government can order the military to act, and be held responsible for the consequences. However, under the Rule of Law, the government does not have the political authority to do so. As it cannot act against the rights and liberties of people. The Rule of Law prevents precisely that: an arbitrary action from the government against its own citizens. The moment a government uses its power arbitrarily and without political authority, the Rule of Law is broken.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was the first written constitution of the United States. ... Significantly, The Articles of Confederation named the new nation “The United States of America.” Congress was given the authority to make treaties and alliances, maintain armed forces and coin money
Explanation:
Just by common sense we can rule out both C and B because neither of those make sense for this case. High population really doesn’t matter. So the most logical answer is D. Mostly Defending Familiar Territory
<span>Joan of Arc i hope this helps <3</span>
