Answer:
In a situation when
You go to a flea market and buy a used color TV set for $100. One day you receive a notice that the owner of the TV, which had been stolen from her house and sold by the thief at the flea market, wants the set back. She says if you do not return the TV she will sue you for:
a. conversion, and probably win even though you did not know the set was stolen
Explanation:
Seeing for Conversion is when a person claims that you stole property from him or her. It is the equivalent of theft charges. Prosecutors are the ones that have to bring justice to these kinds of situations, and they can be carried out in small local courts or by the retirement of an attorney to follow the case. Nevertheless, if the person is found innocent, the accused can sue for damages.
Answer:
Assumptions and expectations are the root causes of workplace constraints.
Explanation:
To avoid workplace conflicts one needs detailed information and clarity. If we train ourselves to think in a positive way and act without anger will do wonders. Our conduct in a situation is going to be really different if we take some time to look at good intentions instead of immediately reacting. It's much more productive to turn a bunch of assumptions into a shared understanding of the information.
Answer:
80000 unit of Alpha
Explanation:
This is a Limiting factor/resource constraint question. In certain situations entities suffer from shortage of necessary resources (e.g: shortage of material, labor hours, machine hours), in such circumstances entities strive to allocate the constraint resources to the production of those products which generate the highest contribution per limiting factor and help maximize total contribution. In this case the limiting factor for Cane is Raw material.
Lets suppose that each unit of <em>Alpha and Beta sell for $120 and $80</em> respectively and variable cost per unit of <em>Alpha and Beta is $69 and $20 </em>respectively. Each unit of <em>Alpha and Beta require 2 and 5 pounds</em> of raw material for production respectively.
Now that we have supposed the data we have to compute contribution per unit and then contribution per limiting factor and based on the ranking (i.e highest first) of contribution per limiting factor we decide which product should be given priority for resource allocation.
<em>Lets calculate contribution per unit.</em>
Alpha:
Contribution per unit= SP-VC
Where, SP stands for selling price and VC stands for variable cost.
CPU= 120-69
CPU=$51
Beta:
Contribution per unit= 80-40
CPU=$40
<em />
<em />
<em>Now, lets calculate contribution per limiting factor.</em>
Alpha:
CLF: $51÷2
CLF: $25.5 1st Rank
Beta:
CLF: $40÷5
CLF: $8 2nd Rank
So clearly Alpha has a greater contribution per limiting factor and it implies that Alpha will earn the highest contribution margin therefore Cane should produce and allocate resources to Alpha first and then Beta if there remains any?
Profit maximizing output:
It requires 2 pounds of raw material to produce one unit of Alpha (i.e 80000×2=160000) Therefore Cane should produce 80000 units of Alpha only in order to maximize its profits.
Answer:
Capitation
Fee for service
Explanation:
Bundled payment provide a single payment to hospitals, doctor, physician, and other providers (for home care, lab, medical equipment, etc.) for a defined episode of care. It is described as "a middle channel" between fee-for-service reimbursement (that allows providers to be paid for each service they render to a patient) and Capitation (that allows for providers to be paid a "lump sum" per patient not regarding how many services the patient receives), given the risk is shared between payer and provider. Bundled payments was proposed in the health care reform debate of the United States as a strategy for reducing health care costs, especially during the Obama administration.
Answer:
If the social cost of an activity exceeds the costs relevant to the decision makers in the activity , there is an external diseconomy . If the benefits of an activity exceed its marginal cost , there is an external economy .
Explanation:
Thaats whaaat upp
