Answer:
Expected cash balance = $48000
Explanation:
Given
Cash receipts = 171000
Cash disbursements = 158000
Starting period = 35000
Minimum desired cash balance = 10000
From the above,
Cash available = Cash receipts + starting period
= 171000 + 35000
= 206000
Therefore,
Cash balance at the month end
= Cash available - Cash disbursements (payments)
= 206000 - 158000
= $48000
Answer:
Profit of 3600
Explanation:
I bought the 600 shares at a price of $41.20
so, Cost of buying the shares 24720
Along with it, i also bought the put option in $1.10 with a strike price of $45.
Buying the put option able me to sell the stock in 45 regardless of the price in stock market is.
But at the expiration date, the price of stock is $48.30 (more than strike price of $45)
So, i would not sell my stock to the broker in 45 (strike price) where, i can sell this stock in stock market at $48.30
Selling this stock in 48.30
48.30*600=28980
I must pay the option premium even though i have not utilized the option.
1.10*600=660
Finally,
selling price of shares-cost of buying shares - cost of purchasing premium
28980-24720-660= 3600
The value added lead time is 38 minutes. It takes 24 minutes to assemble the rugs and 14 minutes to cut them, the total time is 38 minutes. The value added lead time is the time spent on all value adding activitie. In this case, the value activities are those that help produce the product being sold because they are adding value to the product.
Answer:
a Conflict of Interest Issue
Explanation:
In many countries, including the USA, the legal system is built on an adversarial process. Each of the conflicting parties is allowed the chance to argue their case as persuasively as possible. It means each side independent representation to defend their rights.
In the adversarial process, a lawyer must be loyal to their client to represent them effectively. It is practically impossible to be loyal to two clients on opposite sides of a court proceeding. Conflicts of interest will arise as the same lawyer cannot argue for and against the issue in the same court.
